aiqbench analysis
This research introduces MIOH, a rigorous benchmark addressing object hallucination in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) across complex multi-image reasoning tasks. By evaluating 29 models under controlled adversarial pressures, the study reveals that hallucinations stem from integration-stage limitations rather than simple perceptual failures, even in state-of-the-art systems like GPT-5 and Gemini-2.5-Pro. This work provides a critical framework for developing more reliable multimodal AI capable of maintaining accurate object representations across diverse visual contexts.
Fine-Grained Multi Image Object Hallucination Benchmark
arXiv:2608.30653v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are increasingly deployed in multi-image scenarios requiring complex reasoning across visual contexts. However, current MLLMs remain fundamentally limited by object hallucination-generating plausible yet factually inconsistent descriptions about objects. Existing benchmarks, designed primarily for single-image settings or providing only high-level multi-image assessments, cannot systematically diagnose how visual complexity and reasoning demands trigger hallucination. To address this gap, we introduce MIOH, a fine-grained multi-image object hallucination benchmark that systematically evaluates object hallucination across four foundational tasks (existence, counting, attribute, position) through three multi-image reasoning patterns (comprehensive, comparative, selective) under three controlled adversarial pressures (visual context scale, perceptual difficulty, contextual bias). Through evaluation of 29 models, we reveal that even state-of-the-art systems like GPT-5 and Gemini-2.5-Pro exhibit distinct failure patterns across different reasoning patterns and tasks. Our evaluation reveals that hallucination stems not merely from perceptual failures but from integration-stage limitations when maintaining object representations across multiple images. MIOH provides a controlled framework for analyzing multi-image object hallucination and serves as a critical evaluation tool for developing more reliable multimodal AI systems.
Abstract:Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are increasingly deployed in multi-image scenarios requiring complex reasoning across visual contexts. However, current MLLMs remain fundamentally limited by object hallucination-generating plausible yet factually inconsistent descriptions about objects. Existing benchmarks, designed primarily for single-image settings or providing only high-level multi-image assessments, cannot systematically diagnose how visual complexity and reasoning demands trigger hallucination. To address this gap, we introduce MIOH, a fine-grained multi-image object hallucination benchmark that systematically evaluates object hallucination across four foundational tasks (existence, counting, attribute, position) through three multi-image reasoning patterns (comprehensive, comparative, selective) under three controlled adversarial pressures (visual context scale, perceptual difficulty, contextual bias). Through evaluation of 29 models, we reveal that even state-of-the-art systems like GPT-5 and Gemini-2.5-Pro exhibit distinct failure patterns across different reasoning patterns and tasks. Our evaluation reveals that hallucination stems not merely from perceptual failures but from integration-stage limitations when maintaining object representations across multiple images. MIOH provides a controlled framework for analyzing multi-image object hallucination and serves as a critical evaluation tool for developing more reliable multimodal AI systems.
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2608.30653 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2608.30653v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.30653 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2026, pp. 18295-18305
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 292 words
Related coverage

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 18, 2026
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · Oct 17, 2026

Evaluating Multimodal Vision Models with Moonshot PerceptionBench Using Robust Data Loading and Automated Judging
MarkTechPost · Aug 3, 2026

[AINews] Agents disprove Polysemanticity; greatly improve Interpretability & Alignment
Latent Space · Oct 16, 2026