aiqbench analysis
FinBench addresses a critical gap in agentic AI by establishing rigorous, time-gated benchmarks for probabilistic calibration and uncertainty quantification specifically within financial forecasting. By penalizing overconfident models with poor competence using proper scoring rules like the Brier score, this work directly tackles the risk of long-term growth erosion caused by hallucinated confidence in decision-relevant systems. The introduction of strict temporal constraints ensures that evaluations reflect real-world market non-stationarity rather than static dataset performance.
FinBench: Time-Gated Calibration and Uncertainty Benchmarking for Agentic Financial Forecasting
arXiv:2607.16229v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as components of agentic systems that observe, plan, and act. In finance, even "assistive" systems become decision-relevant once their outputs are used to size trades or allocate risk. A key failure mode is the confidence--competence gap: a model that is only slightly better than chance but consistently overconfident will, under typical bet-sizing rules, generate negative long-run growth. Existing benchmarks emphasize semantic understanding or point accuracy, but do not directly test probabilistic calibration under the temporal constraints and non-stationarity that define real markets. We introduce FinBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate calibration and uncertainty quality for financial forecasting in a setting that is (i) strictly time-gated to avoid look-ahead bias and (ii) evaluated with strictly proper scoring rules that penalize hallucinated confidence. FinBench tasks require models to output (a) a probability of positive return and (b) an 80% prediction interval for realized log return; evaluation uses the Brier score and the Winkler interval score, along with skill scores against hard baselines. This paper describes the benchmark specification and reports a small pilot run (one trading day; three liquid tickers; 33 forecasts) as a sanity check of the pipeline. The pilot illustrates how calibration-sensitive metrics distinguish between "confident but fragile" behavior and uncertainty-aware forecasting.
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as components of agentic systems that observe, plan, and act. In finance, even "assistive" systems become decision-relevant once their outputs are used to size trades or allocate risk. A key failure mode is the confidence--competence gap: a model that is only slightly better than chance but consistently overconfident will, under typical bet-sizing rules, generate negative long-run growth. Existing benchmarks emphasize semantic understanding or point accuracy, but do not directly test probabilistic calibration under the temporal constraints and non-stationarity that define real markets. We introduce FinBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate calibration and uncertainty quality for financial forecasting in a setting that is (i) strictly time-gated to avoid look-ahead bias and (ii) evaluated with strictly proper scoring rules that penalize hallucinated confidence. FinBench tasks require models to output (a) a probability of positive return and (b) an 80% prediction interval for realized log return; evaluation uses the Brier score and the Winkler interval score, along with skill scores against hard baselines. This paper describes the benchmark specification and reports a small pilot run (one trading day; three liquid tickers; 33 forecasts) as a sanity check of the pipeline. The pilot illustrates how calibration-sensitive metrics distinguish between "confident but fragile" behavior and uncertainty-aware forecasting.
Applications (stat.AP); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computational Finance (q-fin.CP); Portfolio Management (q-fin.PM)
arXiv:2607.16229 [stat.AP]
(or arXiv:2607.16229v1 [stat.AP] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.16229 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 309 words
Related coverage

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026

AI and Quantum Computing Briefing
livetradingnews.com · Aug 4, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jun 7, 2026

An Organizational Second Brain: Building an AI That Learns From Experts
Meta Engineering · Sep 2, 2026