aiqbench analysis
This research demonstrates that for near-term quantum hardware, optimizing the selection of subproblems based on pairwise interactions yields significantly better results than simply increasing qubit counts or using random selection. The study proves that algorithmic improvements in problem decomposition are more critical than backend scaling when dealing with coupling constraints and compilation costs.
Fewer Qubits, Better Choices: Coupling-Aware Sub-QUBO Selection for Quantum-Assisted Traffic Zone Partitioning
arXiv:2609.32627v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Near-term quantum optimizers accommodate roughly a hundred binary variables, requiring large Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization problems to be decomposed into hardware-sized subproblems while other variables remain fixed. Variables are typically selected by ranking the objective changes from individual flips. We show that this rule is uninformative once the incumbent is optimal under single-variable flips: every score represents a cost, while remaining improvements depend on overlooked pairwise interactions. A second-order expansion instead yields a prize-collecting densest-subgraph selection problem, solvable greedily in time linear in the number of variables, and two solver-free bounds bracketing the improvement achievable within a selected subset. On transportation networks from Chicago and Philadelphia, our rule with 16-variable subproblems outperforms random selection with 64, demonstrating that quadrupling device capacity cannot compensate for weaker selection. Replacing geometric adjacency with road-network connectivity widens the margin by a factor of 1.6-1.9. With the selection trace fixed, varying the fraction of subproblems solved on a 120-qubit device from zero to one leaves the final objective unchanged to six significant figures. At tested hardware-accessible sizes, gains therefore arise from selection rather than the backend. Hardware feasibility is limited by coupling terms: 120-variable problems fail to compile with 7,260 terms but succeed with 5,118. Compilation scales almost quadratically with term count and dominates execution cost, reaching 1,752 seconds versus 469 seconds of quantum processing.
Abstract:Near-term quantum optimizers accommodate roughly a hundred binary variables, requiring large Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization problems to be decomposed into hardware-sized subproblems while other variables remain fixed. Variables are typically selected by ranking the objective changes from individual flips. We show that this rule is uninformative once the incumbent is optimal under single-variable flips: every score represents a cost, while remaining improvements depend on overlooked pairwise interactions. A second-order expansion instead yields a prize-collecting densest-subgraph selection problem, solvable greedily in time linear in the number of variables, and two solver-free bounds bracketing the improvement achievable within a selected subset. On transportation networks from Chicago and Philadelphia, our rule with 16-variable subproblems outperforms random selection with 64, demonstrating that quadrupling device capacity cannot compensate for weaker selection. Replacing geometric adjacency with road-network connectivity widens the margin by a factor of 1.6-1.9. With the selection trace fixed, varying the fraction of subproblems solved on a 120-qubit device from zero to one leaves the final objective unchanged to six significant figures. At tested hardware-accessible sizes, gains therefore arise from selection rather than the backend. Hardware feasibility is limited by coupling terms: 120-variable problems fail to compile with 7,260 terms but succeed with 5,118. Compilation scales almost quadratically with term count and dominates execution cost, reaching 1,752 seconds versus 469 seconds of quantum processing.
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Emerging Technologies (cs.ET)
arXiv:2609.32627 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2609.32627v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.32627 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 317 words
Related coverage

Lionel Martellini (EDHEC Quantum Institute): Why business leaders need quantum awareness, not quantum washing
The Quantum Insider · Aug 22, 2026

Alice & Bob, the French Quantum Computing Company Building FTQC
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jul 17, 2026

Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing Companies in 2026
The Quantum Insider · Jun 12, 2026
News Archive 2026
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026