Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper introduces "few-for-many best-arm identification" within multi-objective bandit frameworks, addressing the challenge of selecting a limited set of options to minimize worst-case degradation across multiple objectives. By proposing algorithms like \textsc{GFM-Elim} and \textsc{AFM-Elim}, the authors demonstrate that sharing observations between related objectives can significantly reduce sampling costs compared to optimizing for each objective independently. The work provides theoretical sample-complexity guarantees and validates these efficiency gains on both synthetic and real-world tasks, offering a practical approach for resource-constrained systems with competing goals.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Few-for-Many Best-Arm Identification in Multi-Objective Bandits

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.16840v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Real-world systems often serve many objectives but can deploy only a few options, whose performance must be learned from noisy feedback. Modeling each option as an arm in a multi-objective bandit, we introduce \emph{few-for-many best-arm identification}, which seeks a small set of arms minimizing the worst weighted degradation from the objective-wise optima, rather than the best arm for every objective. We consider both known objective groups and latent groups specified only by a representative budget, and propose \textsc{GFM-Elim} and \textsc{AFM-Elim} with instance-dependent sample-complexity guarantees. For Gaussian rewards, we further derive a lower bound for the latent-group setting and show that it is asymptotically attainable with high probability by an oracle-based Track-and-Stop procedure. Our results show that sharing observations across objectives and ignoring irrelevant objective-wise distinctions can substantially reduce the sampling cost, as confirmed by experiments on synthetic and real-world tasks.

Abstract:Real-world systems often serve many objectives but can deploy only a few options, whose performance must be learned from noisy feedback. Modeling each option as an arm in a multi-objective bandit, we introduce \emph{few-for-many best-arm identification}, which seeks a small set of arms minimizing the worst weighted degradation from the objective-wise optima, rather than the best arm for every objective. We consider both known objective groups and latent groups specified only by a representative budget, and propose \textsc{GFM-Elim} and \textsc{AFM-Elim} with instance-dependent sample-complexity guarantees. For Gaussian rewards, we further derive a lower bound for the latent-group setting and show that it is asymptotically attainable with high probability by an oracle-based Track-and-Stop procedure. Our results show that sharing observations across objectives and ignoring irrelevant objective-wise distinctions can substantially reduce the sampling cost, as confirmed by experiments on synthetic and real-world tasks.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2610.16840 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.16840v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.16840 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 237 words

Related coverage