aiqbench analysis
This research introduces FedeRage, a novel federated learning algorithm that improves convergence and fairness under unknown client participation patterns by integrating Conditional Value-at-Risk into the optimization framework. By characterizing the implicit objective of standard FedAvg in agnostic settings, the method offers a more robust alternative to existing aggregation schemes without requiring prior knowledge of data distributions. The approach demonstrates consistent gains in accuracy and speed across heterogeneous benchmarks, addressing critical challenges in deploying collaborative AI models on real-world devices.
FedeRage: Provably Convergent Agnostic Federated Learning under General Client Drift
arXiv:2609.21057v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative model training without sharing raw data, but its performance degrades under non-IID data and stochastic client participation. Remedies built on classical Federated Averaging (FedAvg) typically presuppose that client participation probabilities are known to the server, which is rarely the case in deployed systems. We first discuss and then characterize the optimization problem that \emph{distributionally agnostic} FedAvg actually solves when participation is entirely unknown, possibly highly skewed, and of variable size across rounds: uniform aggregation is shown to minimize a well-defined stochastic objective, weighted by the participation-induced marginal, at a standard $\mathcal{O}(1/\sqrt{T})$ rate for convex and possibly nonsmooth losses. Building on this characterization, we propose \emph{Federated Risk-Averse Averaging} (\textsc{FedeRage}), a risk-averse extension of FedAvg that embeds the \emph{Conditional Value-at-Risk} (CVaR) into the local objective within a natural distributionally robust optimization (DRO) framework. \textsc{FedeRage} implicitly upweights high-loss and infrequently participating clients while adding only a \emph{single scalar per-client}, and admits an $\mathcal{O}(\kappa/\sqrt{T})$ rate in which the factor $\kappa$ is the upper bound on the ``price" of risk aversion. In contrast with aggregation-alignment schemes based on optimal transport, which require the availability distribution as an input, \textsc{FedeRage} remains agnostic to it. Several experiments on three heterogeneous benchmarks indicate consistent improvements over state-of-the-art methods in accuracy, fairness, and convergence speed.
Abstract:Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative model training without sharing raw data, but its performance degrades under non-IID data and stochastic client participation. Remedies built on classical Federated Averaging (FedAvg) typically presuppose that client participation probabilities are known to the server, which is rarely the case in deployed systems. We first discuss and then characterize the optimization problem that \emph{distributionally agnostic} FedAvg actually solves when participation is entirely unknown, possibly highly skewed, and of variable size across rounds: uniform aggregation is shown to minimize a well-defined stochastic objective, weighted by the participation-induced marginal, at a standard $\mathcal{O}(1/\sqrt{T})$ rate for convex and possibly nonsmooth losses. Building on this characterization, we propose \emph{Federated Risk-Averse Averaging} (\textsc{FedeRage}), a risk-averse extension of FedAvg that embeds the \emph{Conditional Value-at-Risk} (CVaR) into the local objective within a natural distributionally robust optimization (DRO) framework. \textsc{FedeRage} implicitly upweights high-loss and infrequently participating clients while adding only a \emph{single scalar per-client}, and admits an $\mathcal{O}(\kappa/\sqrt{T})$ rate in which the factor $\kappa$ is the upper bound on the ``price" of risk aversion. In contrast with aggregation-alignment schemes based on optimal transport, which require the availability distribution as an input, \textsc{FedeRage} remains agnostic to it. Several experiments on three heterogeneous benchmarks indicate consistent improvements over state-of-the-art methods in accuracy, fairness, and convergence speed.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC); Signal Processing (eess.SP); Systems and Control (eess.SY)
arXiv:2609.21057 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.21057v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.21057 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 318 words
Related coverage
Joint Optimization for Federated Learning and Transmission over Unreliable Wireless Networks with Heterogeneous Data
arXiv · Sep 15, 2026
Communication-Efficient Agnostic Federated Learning via Faster Convergence and Compression
arXiv · Sep 30, 2026
Resilience Beyond Stationary Client Unavailability: Unlocking Efficient and Unbiased Federated Learning
arXiv · Sep 7, 2026
Sign compression for Muon: SignMuon, MuonSign, and the Limits of Error Feedback
arXiv · Aug 3, 2026