aiqbench analysis
FedCoRe addresses a critical gap in federated learning for healthcare by enabling models to adapt when specific data modalities, such as ECGs or chest X-rays, are missing at deployment sites. Rather than generating synthetic images, the method uses paired supervision to learn logit-space corrections that partially recover performance lost due to modality absence. This approach offers a practical pathway to deploy robust multimodal AI systems across hospitals with heterogeneous data access without compromising patient privacy through raw data sharing.
FedCoRe: Target-Adaptive Completion for Missing Modalities in Healthcare Federated Learning
arXiv:2608.18311v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated multimodal models often assume every site has every modality, although hospitals differ in access to EHRs, chest radiographs, and ECGs. We study this setting on a MIMIC-derived respiratory deterioration task with simulated FL clients and introduce FedCoRe (Federated Cross-Modal Representation Completion). FedCoRe learns representation- or logit-space corrections rather than generating synthetic ECGs or CXR images. When a client observes a modality that may be missing at deployment, it evaluates the same example with and without that modality to obtain paired supervision. Only clients with such pairs update the completion module, and validation may retain the unchanged prediction. We freeze the trained multimodal predictor during evaluation so that measured differences come only from completion. Hiding ECG reduced AUROC by about 0.085; paired-example FedAvg restored 0.0415 AUROC, or 49.0% of the lost performance. We therefore report two distinct effects: paired-example FedAvg partially recovers the missing-ECG gap, while validation-selected completion is a task-specific classifier-logit correction rather than literal ECG recovery. For CXR, effect-aware completion recovers 52.8% of the loss in a controlled test where CXR is hidden. Paired-example FedAvg transfers part of this effect, but validation keeps the no-completion baseline for deployment cases whose inputs lack CXR. Thus, FedCoRe should be read as a validation-gated completion/correction framework: it can recover missing-modality signal in supported settings, but it should be deployed only when paired examples and validation evidence support that modality.
Abstract:Federated multimodal models often assume every site has every modality, although hospitals differ in access to EHRs, chest radiographs, and ECGs. We study this setting on a MIMIC-derived respiratory deterioration task with simulated FL clients and introduce FedCoRe (Federated Cross-Modal Representation Completion). FedCoRe learns representation- or logit-space corrections rather than generating synthetic ECGs or CXR images. When a client observes a modality that may be missing at deployment, it evaluates the same example with and without that modality to obtain paired supervision. Only clients with such pairs update the completion module, and validation may retain the unchanged prediction. We freeze the trained multimodal predictor during evaluation so that measured differences come only from completion. Hiding ECG reduced AUROC by about 0.085; paired-example FedAvg restored 0.0415 AUROC, or 49.0% of the lost performance. We therefore report two distinct effects: paired-example FedAvg partially recovers the missing-ECG gap, while validation-selected completion is a task-specific classifier-logit correction rather than literal ECG recovery. For CXR, effect-aware completion recovers 52.8% of the loss in a controlled test where CXR is hidden. Paired-example FedAvg transfers part of this effect, but validation keeps the no-completion baseline for deployment cases whose inputs lack CXR. Thus, FedCoRe should be read as a validation-gated completion/correction framework: it can recover missing-modality signal in supported settings, but it should be deployed only when paired examples and validation evidence support that modality.
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2608.18311 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2608.18311v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18311 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 331 words
