aiqbench analysis
FedCC addresses a critical bottleneck in distillation-based federated learning by introducing an 'unknown' class to handle label distribution skew without relying on ground-truth labels. This approach prevents error propagation from misclassifying ambiguous samples, significantly improving accuracy when client data is highly heterogeneous. The method offers a robust solution for deploying collaborative models across devices with limited or biased local datasets.
FedCC: Towards Addressing Label Distribution Skews in Distillation-Based Federated Learning
arXiv:2608.23031v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) enables distributed clients to collaboratively train models without sharing raw data, making it promising for leveraging massive devices in communication networks. In distillation-based FL, each client applies its local model on an unlabeled public dataset, and shares only prediction results with the server. While heterogeneous local data introduces label distribution skew, thus biasing client models toward majority classes and leading to potentially inaccurate predictions. The lack of ground-truth labels in the public dataset hampers the server's ability to calibrate predictions, which ultimately degrades overall performance. To address this, we propose FedCC, a simple and effective algorithm for mitigating client misclassification. Instead of being forced to classify and risking error propagation, clients are allowed to tag ambiguous samples as 'unknown'. This additional class, together with calibrated pseudo-labels on the public data, balances confidence in majority classes against uncertainty in under-represented ones. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FedCC significantly outperforms existing methods, especially under severe label skew. In the extreme scenario where each client holds samples from only one of ten classes, FedCC achieves 67.3% accuracy, while baselines collapse to near-random results.
Abstract:Federated Learning (FL) enables distributed clients to collaboratively train models without sharing raw data, making it promising for leveraging massive devices in communication networks. In distillation-based FL, each client applies its local model on an unlabeled public dataset, and shares only prediction results with the server. While heterogeneous local data introduces label distribution skew, thus biasing client models toward majority classes and leading to potentially inaccurate predictions. The lack of ground-truth labels in the public dataset hampers the server's ability to calibrate predictions, which ultimately degrades overall performance. To address this, we propose FedCC, a simple and effective algorithm for mitigating client misclassification. Instead of being forced to classify and risking error propagation, clients are allowed to tag ambiguous samples as 'unknown'. This additional class, together with calibrated pseudo-labels on the public data, balances confidence in majority classes against uncertainty in under-represented ones. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FedCC significantly outperforms existing methods, especially under severe label skew. In the extreme scenario where each client holds samples from only one of ten classes, FedCC achieves 67.3% accuracy, while baselines collapse to near-random results.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2608.23031 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.23031v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.23031 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 279 words
Related coverage

Synthetic Data Generation for Financial AI Research with NVIDIA NeMo
NVIDIA · Jul 9, 2026

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · Jul 27, 2026
State of the Field: AI for Epistemics and Coordination
LessWrong · Oct 2, 2026

NVIDIA speeds up financial clustering with GPU factorization
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 5, 2026