Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This study provides a rigorous fault-tolerant comparison between qudit and qubit encodings for simulating diagonal quadratic operators in lattice field theories, focusing on non-Clifford gate costs as the primary resource metric. The analysis reveals that while asymptotic advantages favor standard qubit approaches under current synthesis models, specific low-dimensional regimes offer meaningful constant-factor savings using qudits within Linear Combination of Unitaries (LCU) frameworks. These findings establish critical break-even thresholds for compiler optimization and overhead budgets in future quantum simulations of scalar fields.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Fault-Tolerant Resource Comparison of Qudit and Qubit Encodings for Diagonal Quadratic Operators

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2604.26792v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Finite local Hilbert-space truncations arise naturally in quantum simulations of lattice field theories and motivate qudit encodings, but their fault-tolerant advantage over qubit encodings remains unclear. We compare the non-Clifford cost of implementing quadratic diagonal evolutions, exemplified by $U=e^{-it\phi_x^2}$ in a uniform field-amplitude discretization of a real scalar field, using either one logical $d$-level qudit or $n_b=\lceil \log_2 d\rceil$ logical qubits. We analyze two standard settings: product-formula simulation and LCU/block encoding, taking the resource metric to be the number of non-Clifford gates after synthesis into a discrete logical gate set. Because tight synthesis bounds for general single-qudit rotations are not known, we express the qudit constructions in terms of embedded two-level $SU(2)$ rotations and derive explicit finite-$d$ break-even conditions for their synthesis cost; these serve as compiler targets for when qudit encodings can outperform the qubit baseline. Within the constructive models studied here, product-formula implementations would require an exponentially stronger per-primitive synthesis advantage for qudits to win asymptotically, while in the LCU setting the qubit encoding is asymptotically cheaper in $d$. Nevertheless, the finite-$d$ threshold analysis identifies low dimensional regions in which qudits can yield meaningful constant-factor savings, particularly for LCU-based implementations. As a secondary analysis of the LCU construction, we use an idealized negligible-overhead qubit-qudit code-switching model to give an absolute $T$-count comparison, and reinterpret the savings as an allowable per-switch overhead budget.

Abstract:Finite local Hilbert-space truncations arise naturally in quantum simulations of lattice field theories and motivate qudit encodings, but their fault-tolerant advantage over qubit encodings remains unclear. We compare the non-Clifford cost of implementing quadratic diagonal evolutions, exemplified by $U=e^{-it\phi_x^2}$ in a uniform field-amplitude discretization of a real scalar field, using either one logical $d$-level qudit or $n_b=\lceil \log_2 d\rceil$ logical qubits. We analyze two standard settings: product-formula simulation and LCU/block encoding, taking the resource metric to be the number of non-Clifford gates after synthesis into a discrete logical gate set. Because tight synthesis bounds for general single-qudit rotations are not known, we express the qudit constructions in terms of embedded two-level $SU(2)$ rotations and derive explicit finite-$d$ break-even conditions for their synthesis cost; these serve as compiler targets for when qudit encodings can outperform the qubit baseline. Within the constructive models studied here, product-formula implementations would require an exponentially stronger per-primitive synthesis advantage for qudits to win asymptotically, while in the LCU setting the qubit encoding is asymptotically cheaper in $d$. Nevertheless, the finite-$d$ threshold analysis identifies low dimensional regions in which qudits can yield meaningful constant-factor savings, particularly for LCU-based implementations. As a secondary analysis of the LCU construction, we use an idealized negligible-overhead qubit-qudit code-switching model to give an absolute $T$-count comparison, and reinterpret the savings as an allowable per-switch overhead budget.

25 pages, 3 figures. Revised following peer review, accepted for publication in Physical Review A

arXiv:2604.26792 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2604.26792v3 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.1103/832q-bqlx DOI(s) linking to related resources

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 253 words

Related coverage