aiqbench analysis
This research presents a critical advancement for fault-tolerant bosonic quantum computing by eliminating the logical error floor associated with non-Clifford $T$ gates through on-demand noise biasing. The authors demonstrate that high-fidelity operations are achievable without postselection, provided sufficient GKP squeezing is available, while also introducing a new algebraic framework based on polynomial phase stabilizers for analyzing diagonal gates in higher Clifford hierarchies. These developments directly address fundamental scalability challenges in continuous-variable quantum architectures by optimizing error correction circuits and gate implementations.
Fault-Tolerant Non-Clifford GKP Gates using Polynomial Phase Gates and On-Demand Noise Biasing
arXiv:2511.20355v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) error correcting code uses a bosonic mode to encode a logical qubit, and has the attractive property that its logical Clifford gates can be implemented using Gaussian unitary gates. In contrast, a direct unitary implementation of the ${T}$ gate using the cubic phase gate has been shown to have logical error floor unless the GKP codestate has a biased noise profile [1]. In this work, we propose a method for on-demand noise biasing based on a standard GKP error correction circuit. This on-demand biasing circuit can be used to bias the GKP codestate before a $T$ gate and return it to a non-biased state afterwards. With the on-demand biasing circuit, we prove that the logical error rate of the $T$ gate can be made arbitrarily small as the quality of the GKP codestates increases. We complement our proof with a numerical investigation of the cubic phase gate subject to a phenomenological noise model, showing that the ${T}$ gate can achieve average gate fidelities above $99\%$ with 12 dB of GKP squeezing without the use of postselection. Moreover, we develop a formalism for finding optimal unitary representations of logical diagonal gates in higher levels of the Clifford hierarchy that is based on a framework of ``polynomial phase stabilizers'' whose exponents are polynomial functions of one of the quadrature operators. This formalism naturally extends to multi-qubit logical gates and even to number-phase bosonic codes, providing a powerful algebraic tool for analyzing non-Clifford gates in bosonic quantum codes. [1] J. Hastrup, M. V. Larsen, J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen, N. C. Menicucci, and U. L. Andersen, Phys. Rev. A 103, 032409 (2021)
Abstract:The Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) error correcting code uses a bosonic mode to encode a logical qubit, and has the attractive property that its logical Clifford gates can be implemented using Gaussian unitary gates. In contrast, a direct unitary implementation of the ${T}$ gate using the cubic phase gate has been shown to have logical error floor unless the GKP codestate has a biased noise profile [1]. In this work, we propose a method for on-demand noise biasing based on a standard GKP error correction circuit. This on-demand biasing circuit can be used to bias the GKP codestate before a $T$ gate and return it to a non-biased state afterwards. With the on-demand biasing circuit, we prove that the logical error rate of the $T$ gate can be made arbitrarily small as the quality of the GKP codestates increases. We complement our proof with a numerical investigation of the cubic phase gate subject to a phenomenological noise model, showing that the ${T}$ gate can achieve average gate fidelities above $99\%$ with 12 dB of GKP squeezing without the use of postselection. Moreover, we develop a formalism for finding optimal unitary representations of logical diagonal gates in higher levels of the Clifford hierarchy that is based on a framework of ``polynomial phase stabilizers'' whose exponents are polynomial functions of one of the quadrature operators. This formalism naturally extends to multi-qubit logical gates and even to number-phase bosonic codes, providing a powerful algebraic tool for analyzing non-Clifford gates in bosonic quantum codes. [1] J. Hastrup, M. V. Larsen, J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen, N. C. Menicucci, and U. L. Andersen, Phys. Rev. A 103, 032409 (2021)
44 pages, 8 figures. Add feedback from Reviewers. Update DOI to the published version
arXiv:2511.20355 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2511.20355v2 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.20355 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
https://doi.org/10.1103/2pg9-nsn8 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 383 words
Related coverage

A brief history of quantum vs classical computational advantage
Quantum Journal · Sep 1, 2026

What is Quantum Error Correction? Complete 2026 Beginner’s Guide
Quantum Zeitgeist · May 29, 2026
Quantum phase estimation with optimal confidence interval using three control qubits
Quantum Journal · Aug 19, 2026

The Steane Code Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 5, 2026