aiqbench analysis
This study reveals that random initialization seeds in speech LLM fine-tuning introduce significant variability in demographic fairness metrics, often outweighing the impact of audio compression factors. For practitioners deploying automatic speech recognition systems, this underscores the necessity of evaluating multiple training runs rather than relying on a single model to ensure robust and equitable performance across diverse populations.
Fairness Beyond a Single Run: Training-Seed Variability in Speech LLM Adaptation
arXiv:2609.38976v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Demographic fairness gaps in automatic speech recognition are almost always reported from a single training run. We fine-tune the Q-former projector and LoRA adapters of a speech LLM at five audio compression factors and six random seeds, holding the encoder, base decoder, data and decoding fixed, and evaluate every run on Common Voice and Fair-Speech. At 460 h of clean LibriSpeech, the seed moves fairness metrics more than compression does on most demographic axes. A balanced 3x3 decomposition attributes 85.3% of the variation in Fair-Speech ethnicity normalized gap to the seed against 8.3% to compression (p = 0.009), though compression explains more on age and gender. Held-out LibriSpeech word error rate spreads by 0.04 points across those seeds while Common Voice spreads by 8.57, so these are not failed runs, and the effect survives controlling for accuracy and dropout. Scaling and diversifying the adaptation set to 960 h damps the effect but does not remove it. On Fair-Speech ethnicity, two single-run systems must differ by more than 0.30 in normalized gap to exceed seed variability.
Abstract:Demographic fairness gaps in automatic speech recognition are almost always reported from a single training run. We fine-tune the Q-former projector and LoRA adapters of a speech LLM at five audio compression factors and six random seeds, holding the encoder, base decoder, data and decoding fixed, and evaluate every run on Common Voice and Fair-Speech. At 460 h of clean LibriSpeech, the seed moves fairness metrics more than compression does on most demographic axes. A balanced 3x3 decomposition attributes 85.3% of the variation in Fair-Speech ethnicity normalized gap to the seed against 8.3% to compression (p = 0.009), though compression explains more on age and gender. Held-out LibriSpeech word error rate spreads by 0.04 points across those seeds while Common Voice spreads by 8.57, so these are not failed runs, and the effect survives controlling for accuracy and dropout. Scaling and diversifying the adaptation set to 960 h damps the effect but does not remove it. On Fair-Speech ethnicity, two single-run systems must differ by more than 0.30 in normalized gap to exceed seed variability.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.38976 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.38976v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.38976 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 270 words
Related coverage

Runway’s WorldPrompt and the Engineering of Real-Time Worlds
Latent Space · Sep 25, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 10, 2026

BRICS Draws a New Global Line: Full Text of New Delhi Declaration
slguardian.org · Sep 12, 2026

Jev: System One models for Prod, not God — with Diogo Almeida, CEO, TypeSafe AI
Latent Space · Sep 21, 2026