aiqbench analysis
This research proposes a multimodal large language model framework designed to automate credit card fraud investigations, directly addressing analyst fatigue by generating logical evidence chains and explanatory reports. By leveraging reasoning and code execution capabilities, the system demonstrates measurable improvements in F1 scores on borderline cases, offering a practical application of AI agents within high-stakes security workflows.
FAA Framework: A Large Language Model-Based Approach for Credit Card Fraud Investigations
arXiv:2506.11635v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Credit card fraud mitigation plays a significant role in modern society. While fraud detection systems are essential, they often struggle to keep pace with the constantly evolving fraud techniques. As a result, fraud investigation is an important complementary process required for continuously improving detection models, identifying emerging fraud patterns, providing case explanations of to stakeholders, and maintaining customers' trust. However, fraud analysts are overwhelmed with an enormous number of alerts generated by credit card transaction monitoring systems. Each alert investigation requires careful attention, domain expertise, and thorough documentation of the investigation outcomes, leading to alert fatigue. To address this challenge, we introduce the first Fraud Investigation Assistant (FIA) framework, which employs multimodal large language models (LLMs) to automate key steps of credit card fraud investigation and generate explanatory reports. FIA leverages the reasoning, code execution, and vision capabilities of LLMs to collect relevant and logically consistent evidence while maintaining relatively short investigation trajectories. Experiments with the Sparkov and CCTD datasets show that FIA gradually improves the F1 score while investigating borderline cases, reaching 8% improvement after only 1,500 additional investigations. These results suggest that LLM-based agents can assist with automating substantial parts of the fraud investigation process and may be particularly useful for resolving ambiguous alerts.
Abstract:Credit card fraud mitigation plays a significant role in modern society. While fraud detection systems are essential, they often struggle to keep pace with the constantly evolving fraud techniques. As a result, fraud investigation is an important complementary process required for continuously improving detection models, identifying emerging fraud patterns, providing case explanations of to stakeholders, and maintaining customers' trust. However, fraud analysts are overwhelmed with an enormous number of alerts generated by credit card transaction monitoring systems. Each alert investigation requires careful attention, domain expertise, and thorough documentation of the investigation outcomes, leading to alert fatigue. To address this challenge, we introduce the first Fraud Investigation Assistant (FIA) framework, which employs multimodal large language models (LLMs) to automate key steps of credit card fraud investigation and generate explanatory reports. FIA leverages the reasoning, code execution, and vision capabilities of LLMs to collect relevant and logically consistent evidence while maintaining relatively short investigation trajectories. Experiments with the Sparkov and CCTD datasets show that FIA gradually improves the F1 score while investigating borderline cases, reaching 8% improvement after only 1,500 additional investigations. These results suggest that LLM-based agents can assist with automating substantial parts of the fraud investigation process and may be particularly useful for resolving ambiguous alerts.
Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2506.11635 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2506.11635v2 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.11635 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 302 words
Related coverage

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 3, 2026

Article: Governing AI in the Cloud: A Practical Guide for Architects
InfoQ · Jun 15, 2026
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · Oct 17, 2026

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026