aiqbench analysis
F(AI)2R introduces a framework where AI agents autonomously manage the provenance graph for research artifacts through an executable skill involving ORCID resolution and CI gating. By extending PROV-O to cover any AI-in-the-loop artifact with human-verified audit rungs, this work addresses critical gaps in accountability as models increasingly draft and refactor scholarly content independently. The approach establishes a verifiable lineage system essential for maintaining trust in automated research workflows where contributions are no longer solely human-generated.
F(AI)2R: Who Did What, and Who Checked? Verifiable AI Provenance as an Executable Skill
arXiv:2607.25637v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: F(AI)2R is FAIR research with AI in the loop, twice: an AI-assisted authoring pass and a machine-readable audit pass over every artefact. AI systems now draft, refactor, and verify research artefacts, yet their contributions are rarely recorded in a form a later human or machine can audit. Building on the original F(AI)2R experiment, we generalize its provenance model beyond scholarly writing into aiprov, a PROV-O extension covering any AI-in-the-loop artefact, and we package the method as an executable skill that an AI agent operates itself: setup asks the human operator for their ORCID ID, resolves their identity from the public registry, and scaffolds continuous integration that gates every push on graph conformance and publishes the current build of this very paper. The paper is its own case study. Every activity, claim, and source in its production is recorded in the repository's provenance graph under two invariants: no parentless claim, and verification rungs that only humans may grant.
Title:F(AI)2R: Who Did What, and Who Checked? Verifiable AI Provenance as an Executable Skill
Abstract:F(AI)2R is FAIR research with AI in the loop, twice: an AI-assisted authoring pass and a machine-readable audit pass over every artefact. AI systems now draft, refactor, and verify research artefacts, yet their contributions are rarely recorded in a form a later human or machine can audit. Building on the original F(AI)2R experiment, we generalize its provenance model beyond scholarly writing into aiprov, a PROV-O extension covering any AI-in-the-loop artefact, and we package the method as an executable skill that an AI agent operates itself: setup asks the human operator for their ORCID ID, resolves their identity from the public registry, and scaffolds continuous integration that gates every push on graph conformance and publishes the current build of this very paper. The paper is its own case study. Every activity, claim, and source in its production is recorded in the repository's provenance graph under two invariants: no parentless claim, and verification rungs that only humans may grant.
Digital Libraries (cs.DL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Social and Information Networks (cs.SI)
arXiv:2607.25637 [cs.DL]
(or arXiv:2607.25637v1 [cs.DL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.25637 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 273 words
Related coverage

NVIDIA-Verified Agent Skills Provide Capability Governance for AI Agents
NVIDIA · May 19, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 18, 2026

Translating CUDA Tile Operations from Python to Rust Using Agentic AI
NVIDIA · Sep 16, 2026
State of the Field: AI for Epistemics and Coordination
LessWrong · Oct 2, 2026