aiqbench analysis
ExtractBench introduces the first comprehensive benchmark specifically designed to evaluate schema-guided document extraction, addressing critical gaps in measuring accuracy, grounding, and cost efficiency at scale. The study reveals that while commercial vision-language models struggle with truncation on long documents, specialized agentic approaches like LlamaExtract Agentic Plus offer superior performance comparable to coding agents but at a significantly lower operational cost. This resource provides the necessary evaluation framework for advancing enterprise AI applications in complex document processing workflows.
ExtractBench: A Benchmark for Schema-Guided Enterprise Document Extraction
arXiv:2607.29677v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Enterprise workflows increasingly rely on agents for \emph{schema-guided extraction}: given a document and a user-defined schema, the agent faithfully follows the schema to produce the correct output with source evidence as grounding metadata. We present ExtractBench, a benchmark for schema-guided extraction and, to our knowledge, the first to score value accuracy, record completeness at scale, grounding, and measured cost together. The evaluation system contains 4,869 pages across 370 enterprise documents, 8 business domains, and 67 document types, with clear tags differentiating their challenge scenarios. The scalable schema and ground-truth curation pipeline combines independent-system agreement for real documents, known values for synthetic lists, and human verification for forms. We report order-insensitive value F1 for value accuracy, plus two grounding metrics for source traceability: word- and page-level F1. Commercial VLMs perform well on short documents but often truncate record lists on long ones, while coding agents retain higher accuracy at much higher cost. LlamaExtract Agentic Plus ranks first on all three metrics, with accuracy comparable to coding agents at a fraction of the cost. Dataset and evaluation code are available on \href{https://huggingface.co/datasets/llamaindex/ExtractBench}{HuggingFace} and \href{https://github.com/run-llama/ExtractBench}{GitHub}.
Abstract:Enterprise workflows increasingly rely on agents for \emph{schema-guided extraction}: given a document and a user-defined schema, the agent faithfully follows the schema to produce the correct output with source evidence as grounding metadata. We present ExtractBench, a benchmark for schema-guided extraction and, to our knowledge, the first to score value accuracy, record completeness at scale, grounding, and measured cost together. The evaluation system contains 4,869 pages across 370 enterprise documents, 8 business domains, and 67 document types, with clear tags differentiating their challenge scenarios. The scalable schema and ground-truth curation pipeline combines independent-system agreement for real documents, known values for synthetic lists, and human verification for forms. We report order-insensitive value F1 for value accuracy, plus two grounding metrics for source traceability: word- and page-level F1. Commercial VLMs perform well on short documents but often truncate record lists on long ones, while coding agents retain higher accuracy at much higher cost. LlamaExtract Agentic Plus ranks first on all three metrics, with accuracy comparable to coding agents at a fraction of the cost. Dataset and evaluation code are available on \href{this https URL}{HuggingFace} and \href{this https URL}{GitHub}.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2607.29677 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2607.29677v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.29677 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 280 words
Related coverage

Introducing Mistral OCR 4
Mistral AI · Jun 23, 2026
IDP AutoOpt: Agent-Driven Optimization of Document Processing Pipeline Configurations
arXiv · Jul 31, 2026

Operationalizing Genie Ontology in Your Data Stack
Databricks · Sep 1, 2026

Vertical Advantage: Transforming Industries with Lakebase and Agentic AI
Databricks · Aug 27, 2026