aiqbench analysis
The paper is a theoretical study of how well multi-neuron convex relaxations can verify robustness in ReLU networks. It shows these relaxations remain incomplete under a "universal convex barrier," then identifies two routes to completeness: adding carefully designed neurons or partitioning the input domain. For readers working on verified robustness, the result sets realistic limits on what convex-relaxation verifiers can prove, and it points toward training methods and verifiers built around multi-neuron relaxations.
Expressiveness of Multi-Neuron Convex Relaxations in Neural Network Certification
arXiv:2410.06816v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Neural network certification methods heavily rely on convex relaxations to provide robustness guarantees. However, these relaxations are often imprecise: even the most accurate single-neuron relaxation is incomplete for general ReLU networks, a limitation known as the *single-neuron convex barrier*. While multi-neuron relaxations have been heuristically applied to address this issue, two central questions arise: (i) whether they overcome the convex barrier, and if not, (ii) whether they offer theoretical capabilities beyond those of single-neuron relaxations. In this work, we present the first rigorous analysis of the expressiveness of multi-neuron relaxations. Perhaps surprisingly, we show that they are inherently incomplete, even when allocated sufficient resources to capture finitely many neurons and layers optimally. This result extends the single-neuron barrier to a *universal convex barrier* for neural network certification. On the positive side, we show that completeness can be achieved by either (i) augmenting the network with a polynomial number of carefully designed ReLU neurons or (ii) partitioning the input domain into convex sub-polytopes, thereby distinguishing multi-neuron relaxations from single-neuron ones which are unable to realize the former and have worse partition complexity for the latter. Our findings establish a foundation for multi-neuron relaxations and point to new directions for certified robustness, including training methods tailored to multi-neuron relaxations and verification methods with multi-neuron relaxations as the main subroutine.
Abstract:Neural network certification methods heavily rely on convex relaxations to provide robustness guarantees. However, these relaxations are often imprecise: even the most accurate single-neuron relaxation is incomplete for general ReLU networks, a limitation known as the *single-neuron convex barrier*. While multi-neuron relaxations have been heuristically applied to address this issue, two central questions arise: (i) whether they overcome the convex barrier, and if not, (ii) whether they offer theoretical capabilities beyond those of single-neuron relaxations. In this work, we present the first rigorous analysis of the expressiveness of multi-neuron relaxations. Perhaps surprisingly, we show that they are inherently incomplete, even when allocated sufficient resources to capture finitely many neurons and layers optimally. This result extends the single-neuron barrier to a *universal convex barrier* for neural network certification. On the positive side, we show that completeness can be achieved by either (i) augmenting the network with a polynomial number of carefully designed ReLU neurons or (ii) partitioning the input domain into convex sub-polytopes, thereby distinguishing multi-neuron relaxations from single-neuron ones which are unable to realize the former and have worse partition complexity for the latter. Our findings establish a foundation for multi-neuron relaxations and point to new directions for certified robustness, including training methods tailored to multi-neuron relaxations and verification methods with multi-neuron relaxations as the main subroutine.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2410.06816 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2410.06816v5 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.06816 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 312 words
Related coverage
When a Flatness Proxy Is Not a Function: Robustness Certificates and Training Interventions
arXiv · Oct 1, 2026
Terminal-Register Certification for Finite-Measurement Learning of Multiscale Quantum States
arXiv · Sep 30, 2026
Mitigating the Contractivity Trap in Diffusion ODEs via Stein Stabilization
arXiv · Jun 9, 2026
Algebraic Expressivity Certificates for Shallow Polynomial Neural Networks
arXiv · Sep 26, 2026