aiqbench analysis
This paper advances collision risk assessment in autonomous navigation by rigorously defining the mathematical relationships between TCPA, DCPA, and Velocity Obstacles under bounded uncertainty. It demonstrates that while standard metrics lose their joint consistency when uncertainty is introduced, set-valued representations within uncertainty-aware VOs preserve these critical safety guarantees. This work provides essential theoretical foundations for building more robust motion planning algorithms in stochastic environments.
Expressiveness, Equivalence, and Uncertainty in Velocity Obstacles and Closest Point of Approach Metrics
arXiv:2610.07371v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Time to Closest Point of Approach (TCPA), Distance to Closest Point of Approach (DCPA), and Velocity Obstacles (VOs), are widely used to assess and mitigate collision risk in autonomous navigation, yet their relationship and behavior under uncertainty remain largely unexplored. Assuming perfect state information, we establish a relationship between these representations over finite and infinite prediction horizons and derive conditions under which they provide equivalent characterizations of collision risk. Under bounded uncertainty, we extend the Closest Point of Approach (CPA) metrics and VO to convex relative-state sets. We show that in this setting, independently computed TCPA and DCPA bounds lose the joint relationship required for VO membership, while uncertainty-aware VOs preserve this relationship through a set-valued representation of collision-inducing velocities.
Abstract:Time to Closest Point of Approach (TCPA), Distance to Closest Point of Approach (DCPA), and Velocity Obstacles (VOs), are widely used to assess and mitigate collision risk in autonomous navigation, yet their relationship and behavior under uncertainty remain largely unexplored. Assuming perfect state information, we establish a relationship between these representations over finite and infinite prediction horizons and derive conditions under which they provide equivalent characterizations of collision risk. Under bounded uncertainty, we extend the Closest Point of Approach (CPA) metrics and VO to convex relative-state sets. We show that in this setting, independently computed TCPA and DCPA bounds lose the joint relationship required for VO membership, while uncertainty-aware VOs preserve this relationship through a set-valued representation of collision-inducing velocities.
Robotics (cs.RO); Systems and Control (eess.SY)
arXiv:2610.07371 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2610.07371v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.07371 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 217 words
Related coverage

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 15, 2026
State of the Field: AI for Epistemics and Coordination
LessWrong · Oct 2, 2026
Adaptive Cost-Sensitive Machine Learning for Autonomous Robot Navigation Failure Prediction: When Not All Errors Are Equal
arXiv · Sep 9, 2026

Deconfusing Corrigibility
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 17, 2026