Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Safety

aiqbench analysis

This study reveals that the energy consumption during the development phase of deep learning audio projects is 3 to 256 times higher than model training alone, a metric frequently overlooked in current sustainability assessments. By quantifying costs based on shared computing logs, the research advocates for systematic life-cycle reporting to better address the environmental footprint of AI research.
Sources coveringarXiv, Analytics Vidhya, AI Alignment Forum, InfoQ
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Exposing the Cost of Deep Learning Audio Development

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.01619v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The environmental impact of deep learning has attracted increasing attention over the past decade. Existing studies mainly focus on the energy and carbon emissions of model training and inference, while the whole development phase is often overlooked. Yet, architecture prototyping and intensive experiments are conducted during this stage, which is highly energy-demanding. In this article, we propose a methodology to estimate these costs, based on activity logs from the Grid5000 shared computing platform used by the LORIA laboratory. As a case-study, we focus on audio projects developed in the Multispeech research team. We evaluate the overall energy cost of four projects, and we compare them to those of training the reported models. Our results show that the energy required for the development phase is 3 to 256 times greater than that required to train the best-performing model alone. These results advocate for a more systematic reporting of energy consumption across the entire life cycle of deep learning-based audio projects.

Abstract:The environmental impact of deep learning has attracted increasing attention over the past decade. Existing studies mainly focus on the energy and carbon emissions of model training and inference, while the whole development phase is often overlooked. Yet, architecture prototyping and intensive experiments are conducted during this stage, which is highly energy-demanding. In this article, we propose a methodology to estimate these costs, based on activity logs from the Grid5000 shared computing platform used by the LORIA laboratory. As a case-study, we focus on audio projects developed in the Multispeech research team. We evaluate the overall energy cost of four projects, and we compare them to those of training the reported models. Our results show that the energy required for the development phase is 3 to 256 times greater than that required to train the best-performing model alone. These results advocate for a more systematic reporting of energy consumption across the entire life cycle of deep learning-based audio projects.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Sound (cs.SD)

arXiv:2610.01619 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.01619v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.01619 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 258 words

Related coverage