aiqbench analysis
This research demonstrates that Decoded Quantum Interferometry (DQI) offers provable quantum advantages in memory efficiency for streaming optimization problems, achieving high constraint satisfaction with polylogarithmic space. The study establishes a complete tradeoff curve showing that classical algorithms face inherent hardness when attempting to match these results without exponential time requirements. These findings advance the understanding of fault-tolerant quantum computing by highlighting specific scenarios where qubit overhead is significantly reduced compared to classical approaches.
Exponential quantum advantages for decoded quantum interferometry in the streaming setting
arXiv:2610.01902v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Decoded quantum interferometry (DQI) is a polynomial-time quantum algorithm introduced by Jordan et al. (Nature 2025). For a natural optimization problem, known as optimal polynomial intersection (OPI), it achieves approximation guarantees in regimes where all known classical algorithms require exponential time. Besides time, space is another central resource: storing and manipulating a massive input can be very challenging, especially when logical qubits carry substantial fault-tolerant implementation overhead. This motivates the following question: does DQI yield quantum advantages in memory, and can we prove it unconditionally? We give an affirmative answer to this question in the streaming setting. In particular, we consider a natural generalization of OPI using Hermite interpolation and Hasse derivatives, which asks for a low-degree polynomial satisfying as many constraints on its values and derivatives as possible. As a concrete example, we show [Quantum efficiency.] An adaptation of the DQI algorithm produces a polynomial satisfying $93\%$ of the constraints; moreover, it only reads the input stream in one pass, uses polylogarithmic space, and has polylogarithmic computation time per stream entry. [Classical hardness.] Any classical algorithm that produces an answer satisfying just $76\%$ of the constraints requires polynomial space, even if it can read the input stream with polynomially many passes and can use unlimited time. Our result provides a complete tradeoff curve for the tunable parameters, and implies that DQI has provable quantum advantages for the original OPI problem.
Abstract:Decoded quantum interferometry (DQI) is a polynomial-time quantum algorithm introduced by Jordan et al. (Nature 2025). For a natural optimization problem, known as optimal polynomial intersection (OPI), it achieves approximation guarantees in regimes where all known classical algorithms require exponential time. Besides time, space is another central resource: storing and manipulating a massive input can be very challenging, especially when logical qubits carry substantial fault-tolerant implementation overhead. This motivates the following question: does DQI yield quantum advantages in memory, and can we prove it unconditionally? We give an affirmative answer to this question in the streaming setting. In particular, we consider a natural generalization of OPI using Hermite interpolation and Hasse derivatives, which asks for a low-degree polynomial satisfying as many constraints on its values and derivatives as possible. As a concrete example, we show [Quantum efficiency.] An adaptation of the DQI algorithm produces a polynomial satisfying $93\%$ of the constraints; moreover, it only reads the input stream in one pass, uses polylogarithmic space, and has polylogarithmic computation time per stream entry. [Classical hardness.] Any classical algorithm that produces an answer satisfying just $76\%$ of the constraints requires polynomial space, even if it can read the input stream with polynomially many passes and can use unlimited time. Our result provides a complete tradeoff curve for the tunable parameters, and implies that DQI has provable quantum advantages for the original OPI problem.
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Computational Complexity (cs.CC); Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS)
arXiv:2610.01902 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2610.01902v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.01902 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 333 words
Related coverage

Researchers Achieve 93% Constraint Satisfaction Using Quantum Interferometry
Quantum Zeitgeist · Oct 4, 2026
Exponential quantum space advantage in random data streams
arXiv · Oct 5, 2026

Researchers Prove Quantum Speed-Up in Optimisation Problems
Quantum Zeitgeist · Oct 2, 2026

NISQ, What Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum Means
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 30, 2026