aiqbench analysis
This research introduces solution divergence as a novel metric for evaluating and improving Large Language Model problem-solving capabilities. By demonstrating that higher variability in generated solutions correlates with better performance, the study offers a practical tool to enhance both supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning strategies. This finding provides a fresh perspective on optimizing LLM training beyond traditional labeled data or task feedback loops.
Exploring Solution Divergence and Its Effect on Large Language Model Problem Solving
arXiv:2509.22480v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have been widely used for problem-solving tasks. Most recent work improves their performance through supervised fine-tuning (SFT) with labeled data or reinforcement learning (RL) from task feedback. In this paper, we study a new perspective: the divergence in solutions generated by LLMs for a single problem. We show that higher solution divergence is positively related to better problem-solving abilities across various models. Based on this finding, we propose solution divergence as a novel metric that can support both SFT and RL strategies. We test this idea on three representative problem domains and find that using solution divergence consistently improves success rates. These results suggest that solution divergence is a simple but effective tool for advancing LLM training and evaluation.
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) have been widely used for problem-solving tasks. Most recent work improves their performance through supervised fine-tuning (SFT) with labeled data or reinforcement learning (RL) from task feedback. In this paper, we study a new perspective: the divergence in solutions generated by LLMs for a single problem. We show that higher solution divergence is positively related to better problem-solving abilities across various models. Based on this finding, we propose solution divergence as a novel metric that can support both SFT and RL strategies. We test this idea on three representative problem domains and find that using solution divergence consistently improves success rates. These results suggest that solution divergence is a simple but effective tool for advancing LLM training and evaluation.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2509.22480 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2509.22480v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.22480 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 219 words
Related coverage
Untrusted advice for AI control: Short, strong advice significantly uplifts weak LLMs
LessWrong · Jul 27, 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · Jul 31, 2026
Angles of attack for continual learning safety
LessWrong · Jun 16, 2026

Informe de riesgos de la IA de frontera (febrero–marzo de 2026)
METR · May 19, 2026