Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This study demonstrates how explainable AI (XAI) attribution methods can robustly predict human fMRI data, revealing distinct computational roles across LLM layers that mirror auditory and cortical processing in the brain. By isolating contributions beyond acoustic confounds, researchers gain a clearer mechanistic understanding of where and why model representations align with neural activity during language comprehension.
Sources coveringarXiv, AI Alignment Forum, LessWrong
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Explanations of Large Language Models Explain Language Representations in the Brain

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2502.14671v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) representations are known to align with brain activity during language processing, but it remains unclear what drives this alignment. We test whether explainable AI (XAI) can help answer this: using attribution methods, we quantify the contribution of each input word to an LLM's next-word predictions and use these explanations to predict fMRI data from participants listening to narratives. We find that gradient-based attribution methods robustly align with brain activity, contribute unique variance beyond acoustic and word-rate confounds, and outperform internal representations in early auditory regions. Using conductance, we extend attribution from words to individual layers, asking what each layer's attribution reveals about the model's computation and how this relates to its brain alignment. Early layers show greater word-type sensitivity and align preferentially with auditory regions, whereas the final layer's attribution is dominated by positional information and exhibits broad cortical alignment. Together, these findings demonstrate that attribution-based explanations can be used not only to measure LLM--brain alignment but to characterize what it reflects.

Abstract:Large Language Model (LLM) representations are known to align with brain activity during language processing, but it remains unclear what drives this alignment. We test whether explainable AI (XAI) can help answer this: using attribution methods, we quantify the contribution of each input word to an LLM's next-word predictions and use these explanations to predict fMRI data from participants listening to narratives. We find that gradient-based attribution methods robustly align with brain activity, contribute unique variance beyond acoustic and word-rate confounds, and outperform internal representations in early auditory regions. Using conductance, we extend attribution from words to individual layers, asking what each layer's attribution reveals about the model's computation and how this relates to its brain alignment. Early layers show greater word-type sensitivity and align preferentially with auditory regions, whereas the final layer's attribution is dominated by positional information and exhibits broad cortical alignment. Together, these findings demonstrate that attribution-based explanations can be used not only to measure LLM--brain alignment but to characterize what it reflects.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Neurons and Cognition (q-bio.NC)

arXiv:2502.14671 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2502.14671v4 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.14671 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 266 words

Related coverage