Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces explanation-based runtime verification to ensure the safety of ML-driven optical networks by validating decisions against physical laws before execution. By leveraging XAI insights, the method effectively intercepts erroneous predictions in tasks like lightpath quality classification while maintaining high automation rates. This approach addresses a critical gap where incorrect AI control-plane actions could otherwise destabilize network infrastructure.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Explanation-Based Runtime Verification for Trustworthy ML-driven Optical Networks

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2607.20675v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine learning (ML) models are increasingly integrated into optical network automation frameworks to support tasks such as failure management, performance monitoring and resource allocation. In these environments, ML-driven predictions may be directly coupled with control-plane actions where incorrect decisions can immediately impact service quality, resource efficiency, and network stability. As automation levels increase, ensuring the reliability of individual decisions at deployment time becomes a critical requirement. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques have emerged to improve transparency by highlighting the factors influencing ML predictions. In addition to identifying influential features, they provide insights into the underlying reasoning process of the model, revealing how different input variables contribute to the final outcome and how feature interactions shape the decision boundary. In this work, we introduce explanation-based runtime verification, an approach that exploits model explanations to assess the soundness of individual ML decisions before they are executed in the network control loop. The proposed approach evaluates explanation coherence and physics grounding consistency at runtime, enabling the system to defer or reject decisions flagged as uncertain. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on a representative use case of lightpath quality of transmission classification. Experimental results show that explanation-based verification can intercept a significant fraction of erroneous decisions while preserving high automation rate.

Abstract:Machine learning (ML) models are increasingly integrated into optical network automation frameworks to support tasks such as failure management, performance monitoring and resource allocation. In these environments, ML-driven predictions may be directly coupled with control-plane actions where incorrect decisions can immediately impact service quality, resource efficiency, and network stability. As automation levels increase, ensuring the reliability of individual decisions at deployment time becomes a critical requirement. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques have emerged to improve transparency by highlighting the factors influencing ML predictions. In addition to identifying influential features, they provide insights into the underlying reasoning process of the model, revealing how different input variables contribute to the final outcome and how feature interactions shape the decision boundary. In this work, we introduce explanation-based runtime verification, an approach that exploits model explanations to assess the soundness of individual ML decisions before they are executed in the network control loop. The proposed approach evaluates explanation coherence and physics grounding consistency at runtime, enabling the system to defer or reject decisions flagged as uncertain. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on a representative use case of lightpath quality of transmission classification. Experimental results show that explanation-based verification can intercept a significant fraction of erroneous decisions while preserving high automation rate.

6 Pages, 2 Figures. Accepted and presented at the 30th International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modelling (ONDM 2026), Munich, Germany, 12-15 May 2026

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Networking and Internet Architecture (cs.NI)

arXiv:2607.20675 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2607.20675v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.20675 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 257 words

Related coverage