Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Safety

aiqbench analysis

This review establishes a critical taxonomy and vocabulary for Explainable AI (XAI) within computational pathology, addressing the fragmented literature that currently hinders clinical adoption. By mapping specific clinical questions to recommended methods and deployment contexts, it provides a structured framework for verifying AI safety in high-stakes diagnostic environments. The work directly tackles the trust and accountability barriers preventing gigapixel whole-slide image analysis from reaching broader medical practice.
Sources coveringarXiv, AI Alignment Forum, LessWrong, Interconnects
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Computational Pathology: Definitions, Taxonomy, and Recommendations

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.28820v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Computational pathology (CompPath) is transforming medicine by leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to support diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment prediction from gigapixel whole-slide images. Clinical adoption is progressing, but is constrained by concerns about safety, accountability, and regulatory oversight in high-stakes clinical environments. Explainable AI (XAI) systems hold promise for building trust and enabling verification, yet the literature remains fragmented due to inconsistent terminology, overlapping methodological families, ad hoc validation, and current reviews. This review aims to formalize XAI methods in CompPath through the: i) introduction of a pathology-centric vocabulary comprising seven core terms; ii) development of a taxonomy across methodological families and three orthogonal axes (stage, type, scope); and iii) establishment of a task-driven framework that maps five clinical questions to recommended methods, method evaluation, and deployment context. Five key gaps between current XAI capabilities and clinical deployment are identified, and actionable steps are proposed to advance XAI for CompPath.

Authors:Shubham Innani, Suhang You, Adam Shephard, Bhakti Baheti, Francesco Ciompi, Joe Yeong, Nasir Rajpoot, Michael Feldman, Solene Florence Kammerer-Jacquet, Dimitrios Makris, Geert Litjens, Anne L. Martel, Jana Lipkova, April Khademi, Spyridon Bakas, for the MICCAI SIG-CompPath

Abstract:Computational pathology (CompPath) is transforming medicine by leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to support diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment prediction from gigapixel whole-slide images. Clinical adoption is progressing, but is constrained by concerns about safety, accountability, and regulatory oversight in high-stakes clinical environments. Explainable AI (XAI) systems hold promise for building trust and enabling verification, yet the literature remains fragmented due to inconsistent terminology, overlapping methodological families, ad hoc validation, and current reviews. This review aims to formalize XAI methods in CompPath through the: i) introduction of a pathology-centric vocabulary comprising seven core terms; ii) development of a taxonomy across methodological families and three orthogonal axes (stage, type, scope); and iii) establishment of a task-driven framework that maps five clinical questions to recommended methods, method evaluation, and deployment context. Five key gaps between current XAI capabilities and clinical deployment are identified, and actionable steps are proposed to advance XAI for CompPath.

On behalf of MICCAI SIG-CompPath. More information: this https URL

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

arXiv:2608.28820 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2608.28820v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.28820 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 220 words

Related coverage