Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This paper addresses the critical gap between LLM performance and human interpretability by reviewing local explainability and mechanistic interpretability techniques. Through experimental analysis in high-stakes domains like healthcare and autonomous driving, the authors evaluate how these explanations impact trust and identify specific challenges in generating human-aligned outputs. The work outlines a necessary roadmap for advancing trustworthy AI systems by bridging the disconnect between model predictions and user understanding.
Sources coveringarXiv, LessWrong
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Explainability of Large Language Models: Opportunities and Challenges toward Generating Trustworthy Explanations

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2510.17256v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models have exhibited impressive performance across a broad range of downstream tasks in natural language processing. However, how a language model predicts the next token and generates content is not generally understandable by humans. Furthermore, these models often make errors in prediction and reasoning, known as hallucinations. These errors underscore the urgent need to better understand and interpret the intricate inner workings of language models and how they generate predictive outputs. Motivated by this gap, this paper investigates local explainability and mechanistic interpretability within Transformer-based large language models to foster trust in such models. In this regard, our paper aims to make three key contributions. First, we present a review of local explainability and mechanistic interpretability approaches and insights from relevant studies in the literature. Furthermore, we describe experimental studies on explainability and reasoning with large language models in two critical domains -- healthcare and autonomous driving -- and analyze the trust implications of such explanations for explanation receivers. Finally, we summarize current unaddressed issues in the evolving landscape of LLM explainability and outline the opportunities, critical challenges, and future directions toward generating human-aligned, trustworthy LLM explanations.

Authors:Shahin Atakishiyev, Housam K.B. Babiker, Jiayi Dai, Nawshad Farruque, Teruaki Hayashi, Nafisa Sadaf Hriti, Md Abed Rahman, Iain Smith, Mi-Young Kim, Osmar R. Zaïane, Randy Goebel

Abstract:Large language models have exhibited impressive performance across a broad range of downstream tasks in natural language processing. However, how a language model predicts the next token and generates content is not generally understandable by humans. Furthermore, these models often make errors in prediction and reasoning, known as hallucinations. These errors underscore the urgent need to better understand and interpret the intricate inner workings of language models and how they generate predictive outputs. Motivated by this gap, this paper investigates local explainability and mechanistic interpretability within Transformer-based large language models to foster trust in such models. In this regard, our paper aims to make three key contributions. First, we present a review of local explainability and mechanistic interpretability approaches and insights from relevant studies in the literature. Furthermore, we describe experimental studies on explainability and reasoning with large language models in two critical domains -- healthcare and autonomous driving -- and analyze the trust implications of such explanations for explanation receivers. Finally, we summarize current unaddressed issues in the evolving landscape of LLM explainability and outline the opportunities, critical challenges, and future directions toward generating human-aligned, trustworthy LLM explanations.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2510.17256 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2510.17256v2 [cs.CL] for this version)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 227 words

Related coverage