Expected Value Alignment for Generative Reward Modeling in Formal Mathematics Verification

Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used with formal interactive theorem provers such as Lean 4. Scaling these systems with reinforcement learning or search methods requires process reward models (PRMs) that can evaluate intermediate reasoning steps. Existing reward-model designs expose a practical trade-off. Value-head models provide continuous scores but modify the generative model interface, while generative reward models preserve textual rationales but are poorly matched to continuous floating-point regression because numeric values are split across tokens. We introduce Expected Value Alignment (EVA), a reward-modeling procedure that keeps the surface output discrete while extracting continuous scores from the model's token distribution. The model emits integer scores in a structured JSON format, and EVA computes a continuous score as the expectation over the logits of the corresponding anchor tokens. Training combines the causal language modeling objective with an auxiliary mean squared error loss on these expected values. We instantiate EVA in \textit{Leibniz}, a reward model for Lean 4 formal verification, and evaluate it against zero-shot and reward-modeling baselines. The evaluation demonstrates that continuous logit-based scoring significantly reduces discretization artifacts while retaining the interpretability of generative critiques.

Withdrawn due to serious concerns regarding the authenticity and accuracy of the listed authorship. The identity of one or more listed authors cannot presently be verified, and the author list may not represent distinct contributors. The manuscript is withdrawn pending institutional review

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2606.01160 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2606.01160v2 [cs.AI] for this version)