Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This article focuses on EXHIB, a new benchmark designed to evaluate Binary Function Similarity Detection (BFSD) models using realistic, diverse datasets collected from the wild. The study reveals significant generalization gaps in current machine learning approaches, showing that performance degrades substantially when facing high-level semantic differences compared to standard low- or mid-level binary variations.
Sources coveringarXiv, Quantum Frontiers, Interconnects, Latent Space
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

EXHIB: A Benchmark for Realistic and Diverse Evaluation of Function Similarity in the Wild

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2604.01554v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Binary Function Similarity Detection (BFSD) is a core problem in software security, supporting tasks such as vulnerability analysis, malware classification, and patch provenance. In the past few decades, numerous models and tools have been developed for this application; however, due to the lack of a comprehensive universal benchmark in this field, researchers have struggled to compare different models effectively. Existing datasets are limited in scope, often focusing on a narrow set of transformations or types of binaries, and fail to reflect the full diversity of real-world applications. We introduce EXHIB, a benchmark comprising five realistic datasets collected from the wild, each highlighting a distinct aspect of the BFSD problem space. We evaluate 9 representative models spanning multiple BFSD paradigms on EXHIB and observe performance degradations of up to 30% on firmware and semantic datasets compared to standard settings, revealing substantial generalization gaps. Our results show that robustness to low- and mid-level binary variations does not generalize to high-level semantic differences, underscoring a critical blind spot in current BFSD evaluation practices.

Abstract:Binary Function Similarity Detection (BFSD) is a core problem in software security, supporting tasks such as vulnerability analysis, malware classification, and patch provenance. In the past few decades, numerous models and tools have been developed for this application; however, due to the lack of a comprehensive universal benchmark in this field, researchers have struggled to compare different models effectively. Existing datasets are limited in scope, often focusing on a narrow set of transformations or types of binaries, and fail to reflect the full diversity of real-world applications. We introduce EXHIB, a benchmark comprising five realistic datasets collected from the wild, each highlighting a distinct aspect of the BFSD problem space. We evaluate 9 representative models spanning multiple BFSD paradigms on EXHIB and observe performance degradations of up to 30% on firmware and semantic datasets compared to standard settings, revealing substantial generalization gaps. Our results show that robustness to low- and mid-level binary variations does not generalize to high-level semantic differences, underscoring a critical blind spot in current BFSD evaluation practices.

13 pages, 7 figures. This is a technical report for the EXHIB benchmark. Code and data are available at this https URL and this https URL

Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Software Engineering (cs.SE)

arXiv:2604.01554 [cs.CR]

(or arXiv:2604.01554v2 [cs.CR] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.01554 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 295 words

Related coverage