aiqbench analysis
This article focuses on EXHIB, a new benchmark designed to evaluate Binary Function Similarity Detection (BFSD) models using realistic, diverse datasets collected from the wild. The study reveals significant generalization gaps in current machine learning approaches, showing that performance degrades substantially when facing high-level semantic differences compared to standard low- or mid-level binary variations.
EXHIB: A Benchmark for Realistic and Diverse Evaluation of Function Similarity in the Wild
arXiv:2604.01554v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Binary Function Similarity Detection (BFSD) is a core problem in software security, supporting tasks such as vulnerability analysis, malware classification, and patch provenance. In the past few decades, numerous models and tools have been developed for this application; however, due to the lack of a comprehensive universal benchmark in this field, researchers have struggled to compare different models effectively. Existing datasets are limited in scope, often focusing on a narrow set of transformations or types of binaries, and fail to reflect the full diversity of real-world applications. We introduce EXHIB, a benchmark comprising five realistic datasets collected from the wild, each highlighting a distinct aspect of the BFSD problem space. We evaluate 9 representative models spanning multiple BFSD paradigms on EXHIB and observe performance degradations of up to 30% on firmware and semantic datasets compared to standard settings, revealing substantial generalization gaps. Our results show that robustness to low- and mid-level binary variations does not generalize to high-level semantic differences, underscoring a critical blind spot in current BFSD evaluation practices.
Abstract:Binary Function Similarity Detection (BFSD) is a core problem in software security, supporting tasks such as vulnerability analysis, malware classification, and patch provenance. In the past few decades, numerous models and tools have been developed for this application; however, due to the lack of a comprehensive universal benchmark in this field, researchers have struggled to compare different models effectively. Existing datasets are limited in scope, often focusing on a narrow set of transformations or types of binaries, and fail to reflect the full diversity of real-world applications. We introduce EXHIB, a benchmark comprising five realistic datasets collected from the wild, each highlighting a distinct aspect of the BFSD problem space. We evaluate 9 representative models spanning multiple BFSD paradigms on EXHIB and observe performance degradations of up to 30% on firmware and semantic datasets compared to standard settings, revealing substantial generalization gaps. Our results show that robustness to low- and mid-level binary variations does not generalize to high-level semantic differences, underscoring a critical blind spot in current BFSD evaluation practices.
13 pages, 7 figures. This is a technical report for the EXHIB benchmark. Code and data are available at this https URL and this https URL
Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Software Engineering (cs.SE)
arXiv:2604.01554 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2604.01554v2 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.01554 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 295 words
Related coverage

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 3, 2026
Debating RSI, the US-China Gap, and Jaggedness with JS Denain of Epoch AI
Interconnects · Sep 22, 2026

Academia is for Ambition — Alex Zhang, MIT
Latent Space · Oct 2, 2026

Runway’s WorldPrompt and the Engineering of Real-Time Worlds
Latent Space · Sep 25, 2026