aiqbench analysis
This research establishes quantum erasure as a secure operational primitive where thermodynamic work costs directly quantify exclusive control over memory, preventing unauthorized agents from resetting information within bounded energy budgets. By leveraging entanglement and Bell nonlocality, the study provides device-independent protocols that ensure only designated parties can achieve minimal erasure costs, effectively turning a fundamental thermodynamic constraint into a security mechanism for quantum systems.
Exclusive Control of Quantum Memory Erasure
arXiv:2512.05761v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Erasing memory is a fundamental operational task in quantum information processing, governed by Landauer's principle, which links information loss to thermodynamic work. We introduce and analyze assisted quantum erasure, where correlations with a remote system reduce the energetic cost of resetting a memory. We identify exclusive control of erasure as the central operational requirement: only a designated party should be able to achieve the minimal cost, whereas any adversary must fail. In the device-dependent regime, we show that entanglement of formation exactly characterizes exclusivity, establishing entanglement as the decisive thermodynamic resource. Moving to a one-sided device-independent scenario, in which only the memory holder's device is trusted, we develop an operational erasure protocol based on random dephasing and conditional operations. Finally, in a fully device-independent setting, we show how Bell nonlocality and self-testing translate observed violations into lower bounds on any adversary's erasure capability, yielding a device-independent notion of exclusive thermodynamic control. Taken together, these results elevate quantum erasure from a thermodynamic constraint to an operational primitive: the erasure work cost quantifies secure, exclusive control over quantum memory, ensuring that an unauthorized agent cannot fully erase information under a bounded work budget.
Abstract:Erasing memory is a fundamental operational task in quantum information processing, governed by Landauer's principle, which links information loss to thermodynamic work. We introduce and analyze assisted quantum erasure, where correlations with a remote system reduce the energetic cost of resetting a memory. We identify exclusive control of erasure as the central operational requirement: only a designated party should be able to achieve the minimal cost, whereas any adversary must fail. In the device-dependent regime, we show that entanglement of formation exactly characterizes exclusivity, establishing entanglement as the decisive thermodynamic resource. Moving to a one-sided device-independent scenario, in which only the memory holder's device is trusted, we develop an operational erasure protocol based on random dephasing and conditional operations. Finally, in a fully device-independent setting, we show how Bell nonlocality and self-testing translate observed violations into lower bounds on any adversary's erasure capability, yielding a device-independent notion of exclusive thermodynamic control. Taken together, these results elevate quantum erasure from a thermodynamic constraint to an operational primitive: the erasure work cost quantifies secure, exclusive control over quantum memory, ensuring that an unauthorized agent cannot fully erase information under a bounded work budget.
arXiv:2512.05761 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2512.05761v2 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.05761 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 280 words
Related coverage

Inside D-Wave’s Dual-Rail Qubit Roadmap and the New Haven Bet on Logical Qubits
Quantum Zeitgeist · Oct 11, 2026

AI Futures: Racing to Lose, A sermon
LessWrong · Sep 28, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026

University of Bristol Team Develops Stochastic Tsetlin Machine for Interpretable Learning
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jul 15, 2026