aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces Exchange Policy Optimization (EPO), a novel algorithmic framework designed to solve semi-infinite safe reinforcement learning problems by handling infinitely many continuous constraints. By adaptively managing an active constraint set, EPO provides provably bounded safety guarantees and optimal policy performance without relying on naive discretization or probabilistic sampling. Theoretically, it establishes finite convergence and quantifies the gap between the obtained policy and the true optimum, addressing a critical gap in current RL safety certification.
Exchange Policy Optimization Algorithm for Semi-Infinite Safe Reinforcement Learning
arXiv:2511.04147v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Safe reinforcement learning (RL) aims to optimize long-term performance while adhering to safety requirements. However, many practical applications involve an infinite number of constraints, forming semi-infinite safe RL (SI-safe RL). Such scenarios typically appear when safety conditions must be enforced across an entire continuous parameter space, such as ensuring adequate resource distribution at every spatial location. Existing approaches typically tackle these continuous constraints through naive spatial discretization or stochastic sampling. Such methods inherently suffer from residual violations or provide only probabilistic safety guarantees. Therefore, no current framework can handle infinitely many constraints to provide reliable safety certificates. In this paper, we propose exchange policy optimization (EPO), an algorithmic framework that achieves optimal policy performance with provably bounded safety guarantees. EPO operates by iteratively solving safe RL subproblems restricted to a finite constraint set, adaptively adjusting the active set through constraint expansion and deletion. Specifically, at each iteration, constraints violating a predefined tolerance are added to refine the policy, while those with zero Lagrange multipliers are removed after the policy update. This exchange rule limits the subproblem complexity to ensure computational tractability while driving policy convergence. Theoretically, we establish that, under mild assumptions, EPO achieves finite convergence to a policy that both ensures the optimal reward performance and keeps the global constraint violation within the prescribed tolerance. Furthermore, we derive an upper bound on the required number of iterations and quantify the gap between the obtained policy and the true optimum.
Abstract:Safe reinforcement learning (RL) aims to optimize long-term performance while adhering to safety requirements. However, many practical applications involve an infinite number of constraints, forming semi-infinite safe RL (SI-safe RL). Such scenarios typically appear when safety conditions must be enforced across an entire continuous parameter space, such as ensuring adequate resource distribution at every spatial location. Existing approaches typically tackle these continuous constraints through naive spatial discretization or stochastic sampling. Such methods inherently suffer from residual violations or provide only probabilistic safety guarantees. Therefore, no current framework can handle infinitely many constraints to provide reliable safety certificates. In this paper, we propose exchange policy optimization (EPO), an algorithmic framework that achieves optimal policy performance with provably bounded safety guarantees. EPO operates by iteratively solving safe RL subproblems restricted to a finite constraint set, adaptively adjusting the active set through constraint expansion and deletion. Specifically, at each iteration, constraints violating a predefined tolerance are added to refine the policy, while those with zero Lagrange multipliers are removed after the policy update. This exchange rule limits the subproblem complexity to ensure computational tractability while driving policy convergence. Theoretically, we establish that, under mild assumptions, EPO achieves finite convergence to a policy that both ensures the optimal reward performance and keeps the global constraint violation within the prescribed tolerance. Furthermore, we derive an upper bound on the required number of iterations and quantify the gap between the obtained policy and the true optimum.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2511.04147 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2511.04147v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.04147 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 332 words
Related coverage

RL & search is a terrifying way to build AGI (an FAQ)
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 27, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026

The Alignment Problem: Computer Science Meets Analytic Philosophy
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 18, 2026

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 15, 2026