aiqbench analysis
This study introduces EXAONE Demand 1.0, a specialized time series foundation model designed to address the unique challenges of demand forecasting, such as short histories and frequent stock-outs. By leveraging a large-scale corpus augmented with synthetic data and a domain-specific adapter, the model outperforms 36 existing TSFMs across diverse datasets. The research highlights the viability of tailoring general-purpose AI architectures to niche operational domains like supply chain management.
EXAONE Demand 1.0: A Time Series Foundation Model for Demand Forecasting
arXiv:2609.30880v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Time series foundation models (TSFMs) are pretrained on series from diverse domains, where demand series make up only a small fraction. Demand data has properties that such corpora rarely contain: Short histories, frequent zeros, censoring by stock-outs, and exogenous events that the series does not record. To this end, we propose EXAONE Demand, built on 1) a demand-specific corpus and 2) a demand-aware adapter. For the corpus, we assemble 11.3M series and 48.4B observations from 73 sources, and a synthetic generator supplies the behaviour that open demand data under-represents. For the adapter, we attach low-rank branches to a frozen general-domain backbone, one for each of the four demand classes (smooth, intermittent, erratic, and lumpy), and a router that reads eight scale-free statistics of the input series decides how much each branch contributes. We build EXAONE Demand in two versions, one trained on real-world and synthetic demand together and one trained on the synthetic corpus alone. On 22 held-out datasets, both versions outperform 36 TSFMs, and real-world demand adds a gain over synthetic data alone.
Title:EXAONE Demand 1.0: A Time Series Foundation Model for Demand Forecasting
Abstract:Time series foundation models (TSFMs) are pretrained on series from diverse domains, where demand series make up only a small fraction. Demand data has properties that such corpora rarely contain: Short histories, frequent zeros, censoring by stock-outs, and exogenous events that the series does not record. To this end, we propose EXAONE Demand, built on 1) a demand-specific corpus and 2) a demand-aware adapter. For the corpus, we assemble 11.3M series and 48.4B observations from 73 sources, and a synthetic generator supplies the behaviour that open demand data under-represents. For the adapter, we attach low-rank branches to a frozen general-domain backbone, one for each of the four demand classes (smooth, intermittent, erratic, and lumpy), and a router that reads eight scale-free statistics of the input series decides how much each branch contributes. We build EXAONE Demand in two versions, one trained on real-world and synthetic demand together and one trained on the synthetic corpus alone. On 22 held-out datasets, both versions outperform 36 TSFMs, and real-world demand adds a gain over synthetic data alone.
Technical report of EXAONE Demand 1.0
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.30880 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.30880v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.30880 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 288 words
Related coverage

How Decathlon runs demand forecasting at scale with Chronos-2
AWS · Aug 28, 2026

Real-Time Intelligence with IBM Time Series Models on Confluent
Hugging Face · Sep 2, 2026

Vertical Advantage: Transforming Industries with Lakebase and Agentic AI
Databricks · Aug 27, 2026

Prophet vs NeuralProphet vs TimeGPT vs Chronos: A Practical Comparison
Analytics Vidhya · Jun 9, 2026