Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research demonstrates how augmenting prompts with retrieved simplification examples can enhance large language models' ability to rewrite complex documents while maintaining coherence, outperforming both prompt-only methods and supervised baselines like T5 without requiring fine-tuning. The findings highlight that the efficacy of this example-guided approach varies across different model architectures, underscoring the importance of a model's capacity to integrate contextual information during generation.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Example-Guided Prompting for Document-Level Text Simplification

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.05447v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Document-level text simplification requires large language models (LLMs) to rewrite complex documents while preserving meaning, readability, and discourse coherence. Although prompt-based LLMs have shown promising performance, they often produce inconsistent simplifications because textual instructions alone provide limited guidance for complex document-level transformations. We investigate whether retrieved document-simplification examples can improve document-level generation by augmenting prompts with examples selected from a parallel simplification corpus. This example-guided prompting approach enables LLMs to exploit relevant simplification patterns without task-specific fine-tuning. Experiments on the OneStopEnglish corpus using multiple state-of-the-art LLMs show that incorporating retrieved examples consistently improves simplification quality over prompt-only generation and achieves competitive or superior performance compared with representative supervised (T5) and planning-based (PlanSimp) document simplification systems. Furthermore, we find that the benefits of example-guided prompting vary across LLMs, suggesting that effective use of retrieved examples depends on a model's ability to integrate contextual information during generation.

Abstract:Document-level text simplification requires large language models (LLMs) to rewrite complex documents while preserving meaning, readability, and discourse coherence. Although prompt-based LLMs have shown promising performance, they often produce inconsistent simplifications because textual instructions alone provide limited guidance for complex document-level transformations. We investigate whether retrieved document-simplification examples can improve document-level generation by augmenting prompts with examples selected from a parallel simplification corpus. This example-guided prompting approach enables LLMs to exploit relevant simplification patterns without task-specific fine-tuning. Experiments on the OneStopEnglish corpus using multiple state-of-the-art LLMs show that incorporating retrieved examples consistently improves simplification quality over prompt-only generation and achieves competitive or superior performance compared with representative supervised (T5) and planning-based (PlanSimp) document simplification systems. Furthermore, we find that the benefits of example-guided prompting vary across LLMs, suggesting that effective use of retrieved examples depends on a model's ability to integrate contextual information during generation.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2608.05447 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2608.05447v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.05447 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 240 words

Related coverage