Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces exact spin elimination, a technique that trades auxiliary spins for higher-order interactions to solve Ising optimization problems within fixed hardware constraints. By minimizing over single spins and utilizing the Walsh basis, the method significantly boosts success rates on both quadratic and three-body instances while reducing time-to-solution. The findings demonstrate that increasing interaction complexity can effectively expand problem capacity without requiring additional qubits or couplings.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Exact Spin Elimination for Quadratic and k-Local Ising Optimization

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2505.07163v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Ising solvers have a finite spin budget. Quadratization uses auxiliary spins to replace higher-order interactions by pairwise ones. We show that removing spins while allowing more complex interactions can fit larger problems within the same spin budget and improve optimization. Walsh elimination minimizes over one spin at a time, writes the resulting interaction as a sum of spin products in the Walsh basis, and stores a rule for recovering the removed spin. Explicit resource limits control which eliminations are accepted. In a held-out test with the protocol frozen before instance generation and one annealing schedule shared by both formulations, mean observed success rises from 10.4% to 97.5% on sparse quadratic spin glasses and from 16.9% to 87.5% on three-body problems. Observed success increases on every instance with a verified reference minimum, and pooled time-to-solution estimates decrease by factors of about 34 and 11, respectively, with preprocessing included. For zero-field pairwise models on connected simple cubic graphs with more than four vertices, we prove that a fixed spin budget accommodates 50% larger inputs while retaining pairwise interactions, zero fields, residual degree at most six, and no increase in coupling count. These results establish exact spin elimination as a controlled trade between active-spin capacity and interaction complexity.

Abstract:Ising solvers have a finite spin budget. Quadratization uses auxiliary spins to replace higher-order interactions by pairwise ones. We show that removing spins while allowing more complex interactions can fit larger problems within the same spin budget and improve optimization. Walsh elimination minimizes over one spin at a time, writes the resulting interaction as a sum of spin products in the Walsh basis, and stores a rule for recovering the removed spin. Explicit resource limits control which eliminations are accepted. In a held-out test with the protocol frozen before instance generation and one annealing schedule shared by both formulations, mean observed success rises from 10.4% to 97.5% on sparse quadratic spin glasses and from 16.9% to 87.5% on three-body problems. Observed success increases on every instance with a verified reference minimum, and pooled time-to-solution estimates decrease by factors of about 34 and 11, respectively, with preprocessing included. For zero-field pairwise models on connected simple cubic graphs with more than four vertices, we prove that a fixed spin budget accommodates 50% larger inputs while retaining pairwise interactions, zero fields, residual degree at most six, and no increase in coupling count. These results establish exact spin elimination as a controlled trade between active-spin capacity and interaction complexity.

Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Discrete Mathematics (cs.DM); Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS); Emerging Technologies (cs.ET); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2505.07163 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2505.07163v2 [quant-ph] for this version)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 230 words

Related coverage