aiqbench analysis
This study demonstrates that providing exact feedback to large language models does not guarantee reliable closed-loop revision, revealing persistent gaps in how different models interpret and act on deterministic constraints. The research isolates model-specific behaviors where failed revision trajectories often repeat earlier errors, indicating that scale and post-training alone do not consistently resolve these fundamental limitations in automated editing workflows.
Exact Feedback Is Not Control: Evaluating Text-based Closed-Loop Revision in LLMs
arXiv:2609.28150v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Closed-loop revision is increasingly used in large language model (LLM) applications, but failures may reflect incomplete feedback or ineffective responses to correct feedback. We introduce a fixed-budget revision protocol with deterministic verifiers that report all remaining violations across exact-length, lexical, and compositional constraints. Fixing feedback correctness and completeness isolates model-side revision behavior. Across 19 open- and closed-source models, controller-level mean final joint success ranges from 17.4% to 99.8%, with substantial cross-model gaps persisting under identical initial drafts. Controlled experiments reveal reproducible model-specific responses to exact feedback. Post-training and scale reshape these responses without consistently bringing them closer to exact correction. Across all constraint families, failed trajectories often repeat earlier outputs, and prior recurrence is associated with lower subsequent recoverability. Matched-state interventions show that removing earlier dialogue while holding the current draft and feedback fixed changes recurrence escape without reliably improving final success; effects depend on the model, task, and trigger-state composition. Exact feedback makes revision errors observable, but does not make the closed loop reliable. Code and reproduction instructions: https://github.com/kevinjiang0121-cyber/exact-feedback-code.
Abstract:Closed-loop revision is increasingly used in large language model (LLM) applications, but failures may reflect incomplete feedback or ineffective responses to correct feedback. We introduce a fixed-budget revision protocol with deterministic verifiers that report all remaining violations across exact-length, lexical, and compositional constraints. Fixing feedback correctness and completeness isolates model-side revision behavior. Across 19 open- and closed-source models, controller-level mean final joint success ranges from 17.4% to 99.8%, with substantial cross-model gaps persisting under identical initial drafts. Controlled experiments reveal reproducible model-specific responses to exact feedback. Post-training and scale reshape these responses without consistently bringing them closer to exact correction. Across all constraint families, failed trajectories often repeat earlier outputs, and prior recurrence is associated with lower subsequent recoverability. Matched-state interventions show that removing earlier dialogue while holding the current draft and feedback fixed changes recurrence escape without reliably improving final success; effects depend on the model, task, and trigger-state composition. Exact feedback makes revision errors observable, but does not make the closed loop reliable. Code and reproduction instructions: this https URL.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.28150 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.28150v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.28150 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 267 words
Related coverage

Why do models task game?
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 6, 2026

Runway’s WorldPrompt and the Engineering of Real-Time Worlds
Latent Space · Sep 25, 2026

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · Oct 12, 2026
Running Variational Quantum Eigensolver with Qiskit Aer on AMD Instinct
AMD · May 29, 2026