Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This research establishes precise entanglement trade-offs for qutrit stabilizer states, clarifying how specific optimization objectives influence residual entanglement distributions in composite-dimensional systems. By linking entropy-deficit metrics to code weight enumerators, the study provides rigorous analytical bounds that are critical for advancing error correction and resource management in higher-dimensional quantum architectures. These findings offer a foundational reference for researchers designing qutrit-based quantum circuits where maximal entanglement is not uniformly available.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Exact entanglement trade-offs in qutrit and composite-dimensional stabilizer states

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2605.05167v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: When absolute maximal entanglement is unavailable in a state family, different objectives can select different distributions of residual entanglement. We determine exact trade-offs for qutrit stabilizer states and binary--ternary product states. For eight qutrits, evaluation of the complete published classification gives three nondominated balanced-cut entanglement profiles, characterized by the probabilities of obtaining three or four maximally entangled qutrit pairs. We relate the squared entropy-deficit objective to code weight enumerators and use a uniformity-forcing bound to prove that its eleven-qutrit minimum is six. The unique minimizing Clifford class is an already classified code, whose entropy profile also attains a sharp bound on average reference--erasure mutual information among four-uniform eleven-qutrit stabilizer states. In local dimension six, explicit sector alignments attain 56 maximally mixed four-party reductions, the maximum for arbitrary binary--ternary product states. Within the stabilizer product family, the exact cost--count Pareto boundary consists of $(44,48)$ and $(48,56)$. These results identify when aggregate optimization determines operational entanglement properties and when it does not. Published classifications supply coverage; analytical bounds, explicit witnesses, and independent arithmetic checks establish the stated consequences.

Abstract:When absolute maximal entanglement is unavailable in a state family, different objectives can select different distributions of residual entanglement. We determine exact trade-offs for qutrit stabilizer states and binary--ternary product states. For eight qutrits, evaluation of the complete published classification gives three nondominated balanced-cut entanglement profiles, characterized by the probabilities of obtaining three or four maximally entangled qutrit pairs. We relate the squared entropy-deficit objective to code weight enumerators and use a uniformity-forcing bound to prove that its eleven-qutrit minimum is six. The unique minimizing Clifford class is an already classified code, whose entropy profile also attains a sharp bound on average reference--erasure mutual information among four-uniform eleven-qutrit stabilizer states. In local dimension six, explicit sector alignments attain 56 maximally mixed four-party reductions, the maximum for arbitrary binary--ternary product states. Within the stabilizer product family, the exact cost--count Pareto boundary consists of $(44,48)$ and $(48,56)$. These results identify when aggregate optimization determines operational entanglement properties and when it does not. Published classifications supply coverage; analytical bounds, explicit witnesses, and independent arithmetic checks establish the stated consequences.

Substantially revised with new results and reproducibility materials. Title and author list updated

arXiv:2605.05167 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2605.05167v3 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.05167 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 278 words

Related coverage