aiqbench analysis
EvoNav-Bench introduces a critical evaluation framework for embodied AI agents operating in dynamic, non-stationary environments where human activity alters the scene between tasks. By exposing existing lifelong navigation methods to environment evolution, this benchmark reveals their brittleness when relying on outdated prior observations compared to simple heuristic adaptation strategies. This work advances the field by addressing a fundamental gap in current robotics benchmarks that assume static worlds, pushing research toward more robust real-world deployment.
EvoNav-Bench: Benchmarking Lifelong Navigation in Evolving Environments
arXiv:2609.08292v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Lifelong navigation (LN) requires an embodied agent to solve a sequence of navigation subtasks in the same environment. Since solving each subtask from scratch incurs redundant exploration, an LN agent must consolidate experience from earlier stages and reuse it in later stages, often through persistent scene representations such as scene graphs or visual snapshots. However, existing approaches typically assume a stationary environment, whereas in real-world LN settings, human activities can cause the environment to evolve. With the stationary assumption violated, existing methods may fuse outdated prior observations with new observations, yet current benchmarks cannot reveal this failure mode. In this paper, we present EvoNav-Bench, which extends the GOAT-Bench style LN formulation in the context of evolving environments. Built on the ProcTHOR framework, EvoNav-Bench introduces environment modifications between navigation tasks, making prior experience useful but not fully reliable. This design enables controlled evaluation of how environment evolution affects LN agents that reuse prior scene observations. Using EvoNav-Bench, we benchmark three recent methods that build and reuse scene representations for navigation. We also compare three simple heuristic strategies for handling environment evolution: Frontier-Update, Fail-then-Update, and Stage-Reset. Our results show that existing methods are brittle under environment evolution, while the heuristic strategies enable a controlled analysis of how agents can adapt to scene changes and mitigate their impact.
Abstract:Lifelong navigation (LN) requires an embodied agent to solve a sequence of navigation subtasks in the same environment. Since solving each subtask from scratch incurs redundant exploration, an LN agent must consolidate experience from earlier stages and reuse it in later stages, often through persistent scene representations such as scene graphs or visual snapshots. However, existing approaches typically assume a stationary environment, whereas in real-world LN settings, human activities can cause the environment to evolve. With the stationary assumption violated, existing methods may fuse outdated prior observations with new observations, yet current benchmarks cannot reveal this failure mode. In this paper, we present EvoNav-Bench, which extends the GOAT-Bench style LN formulation in the context of evolving environments. Built on the ProcTHOR framework, EvoNav-Bench introduces environment modifications between navigation tasks, making prior experience useful but not fully reliable. This design enables controlled evaluation of how environment evolution affects LN agents that reuse prior scene observations. Using EvoNav-Bench, we benchmark three recent methods that build and reuse scene representations for navigation. We also compare three simple heuristic strategies for handling environment evolution: Frontier-Update, Fail-then-Update, and Stage-Reset. Our results show that existing methods are brittle under environment evolution, while the heuristic strategies enable a controlled analysis of how agents can adapt to scene changes and mitigate their impact.
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2609.08292 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2609.08292v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.08292 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 308 words
Related coverage

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 3, 2026

[AINews] Fal’s H3 Max Live breaks the infinite videogen barrier
Latent Space · Sep 1, 2026

How to Evaluate AI Agents From Tool Calls to Task Completion
NVIDIA · Sep 21, 2026

Academia is for Ambition — Alex Zhang, MIT
Latent Space · Oct 2, 2026