aiqbench analysis
This research introduces SkillTGR, a framework that enhances Large Language Models' ability to perform complex operations on tables by representing data as attributed graphs rather than linearized text. By distilling reasoning trajectories into an abstract skill bank and leveraging contrastive learning from both successful and failed attempts, the method significantly improves accuracy while reducing token consumption and inference latency. This work addresses a critical gap in current AI capabilities where models struggle with structured cross-row reasoning despite excelling at simple lookups.
Evolving from Lessons: Skill-Augmented Table Graph Reasoning for Operation-wise Table Question Answering
arXiv:2607.22633v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Table Question Answering (TableQA) aims to reason over tables to answer user queries. Existing research treats all questions uniformly and evaluates solely through overall accuracy, obscuring a critical reality that LLMs excel at simple lookups yet struggle with complex operations like aggregation and arithmetic. To reveal this disparity, we introduce a novel \emph{Operation-wise TableQA} task with a fine-grained question taxonomy and release two datasets named WikiTQ-ow and TabFact-ow for evaluation. As for modeling bottlenecks, existing methods flatten tables into linearized texts, disrupting inherent structures and inducing the ``lost-in-the-middle'' issue, which poses a primary barrier to complex cross-row reasoning. Moreover, they typically reason from scratch, neglecting reusable patterns shared across similar operations. To address these limitations, we propose a Skill-augmented Table Graph Reasoning (SkillTGR) framework for self-evolving structured reasoning. Specifically, SkillTGR represents tables as attributed graphs with explicit row-column-cell structures, where LLMs plan and execute dynamic chains to retrieve evidence subgraphs for graph traversal reasoning. Based on this, SkillTGR builds a hierarchical SkillBank to distill reason trajectories into abstract skills under cognitive heuristics, then hybrid retrieves both successful and failed skills for contrastive augmented table graph reasoning, thereby enabling the continual self-evolution. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SkillTGR achieves superior performance with an average of 5.91\% overall and 6.03\% operation-wise improvement, also reducing 19.76\% token consumption and 27.64\% inference latency. Our codes and data will be released upon publication.
Abstract:Table Question Answering (TableQA) aims to reason over tables to answer user queries. Existing research treats all questions uniformly and evaluates solely through overall accuracy, obscuring a critical reality that LLMs excel at simple lookups yet struggle with complex operations like aggregation and arithmetic. To reveal this disparity, we introduce a novel \emph{Operation-wise TableQA} task with a fine-grained question taxonomy and release two datasets named WikiTQ-ow and TabFact-ow for evaluation. As for modeling bottlenecks, existing methods flatten tables into linearized texts, disrupting inherent structures and inducing the ``lost-in-the-middle'' issue, which poses a primary barrier to complex cross-row reasoning. Moreover, they typically reason from scratch, neglecting reusable patterns shared across similar operations. To address these limitations, we propose a Skill-augmented Table Graph Reasoning (SkillTGR) framework for self-evolving structured reasoning. Specifically, SkillTGR represents tables as attributed graphs with explicit row-column-cell structures, where LLMs plan and execute dynamic chains to retrieve evidence subgraphs for graph traversal reasoning. Based on this, SkillTGR builds a hierarchical SkillBank to distill reason trajectories into abstract skills under cognitive heuristics, then hybrid retrieves both successful and failed skills for contrastive augmented table graph reasoning, thereby enabling the continual self-evolution. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SkillTGR achieves superior performance with an average of 5.91\% overall and 6.03\% operation-wise improvement, also reducing 19.76\% token consumption and 27.64\% inference latency. Our codes and data will be released upon publication.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2607.22633 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2607.22633v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.22633 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 319 words
Related coverage
Presentation: The Future of Engineering: Mindsets That Matter When Code Isn’t Enough
InfoQ · Jul 28, 2026
STRATA: Self-Maintaining Structured Experience Graphs for Self-Evolving Language Agents
arXiv · Oct 15, 2026
Building trade assistant: How Jefferies optimized front office trading operations with AI
AWS · Jul 23, 2026
Performance Profiling on AMD GPUs – Part 5: Profiling-Driven Kernel Optimization with an AI Code-Assist Tool
AMD · Jul 16, 2026