aiqbench analysis
This benchmark addresses a critical gap in LLM agent development by testing how systems maintain performance when their toolkits and capabilities evolve, rather than just changing tasks. The findings highlight that expanding an agent's harness can induce forgetting of previous skills and that adapting to new tools does not automatically preserve old competencies. For researchers building scalable agent ecosystems, this underscores the need for architectures that explicitly manage the tension between retaining legacy knowledge and integrating new functions.
EVOHARNESSBENCH: Can Your Agents Keep Pace with an Evolving Harness?
arXiv:2609.04280v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern LLM-based agents operate through a harness of tools, reusable skills, and specialist agents that shapes what they observe and what they can do. In practice, this harness continually evolves as new capabilities are added. We introduce EVOHARNESSBENCH, a benchmark for evaluating agents under controlled harness evolution across three axes (tools, skills, and agents). Unlike existing continual-learning benchmarks for agents, which typically place non-stationarity (i.e., what changes over time) in the task stream while keeping the harness fixed, EVOHARNESSBENCH places non-stationarity in the externally supplied harness itself. It contains 17 multi-stage harness streams constructed deterministically from verifier-based benchmarks, comprising 802 tasks, 520 tools, 42 skills, and 62 agents. We evaluate two complementary settings corresponding to the central challenges of harness evolution: deployment evaluation, which isolates retention of previously accessible competence as the harness expands, and self-evolving adaptation evaluation, which tests whether accumulated experience remains useful as new capabilities are introduced. Our results reveal three persistent gaps. First, harness expansion alone can degrade performance on previously solved tasks, producing harness-induced forgetting. Second, gains from self-evolving adaptation remain inconsistent across stages of harness evolution, capability axes, and environments. Third, retention and adaptation can pull in different directions: preserving earlier competence does not necessarily improve adaptation to newly introduced capabilities, and vice versa. These results establish harness evolution as a distinct challenge for building agents that can keep pace with an evolving harness while preserving previously effective behavior.
Title:EVOHARNESSBENCH: Can Your Agents Keep Pace with an Evolving Harness?
Abstract:Modern LLM-based agents operate through a harness of tools, reusable skills, and specialist agents that shapes what they observe and what they can do. In practice, this harness continually evolves as new capabilities are added. We introduce EVOHARNESSBENCH, a benchmark for evaluating agents under controlled harness evolution across three axes (tools, skills, and agents). Unlike existing continual-learning benchmarks for agents, which typically place non-stationarity (i.e., what changes over time) in the task stream while keeping the harness fixed, EVOHARNESSBENCH places non-stationarity in the externally supplied harness itself. It contains 17 multi-stage harness streams constructed deterministically from verifier-based benchmarks, comprising 802 tasks, 520 tools, 42 skills, and 62 agents. We evaluate two complementary settings corresponding to the central challenges of harness evolution: deployment evaluation, which isolates retention of previously accessible competence as the harness expands, and self-evolving adaptation evaluation, which tests whether accumulated experience remains useful as new capabilities are introduced. Our results reveal three persistent gaps. First, harness expansion alone can degrade performance on previously solved tasks, producing harness-induced forgetting. Second, gains from self-evolving adaptation remain inconsistent across stages of harness evolution, capability axes, and environments. Third, retention and adaptation can pull in different directions: preserving earlier competence does not necessarily improve adaptation to newly introduced capabilities, and vice versa. These results establish harness evolution as a distinct challenge for building agents that can keep pace with an evolving harness while preserving previously effective behavior.
Multiagent Systems (cs.MA); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.04280 [cs.MA]
(or arXiv:2609.04280v1 [cs.MA] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.04280 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 343 words
Related coverage

Claude Code’s Next Era — Thariq Shihipar, Anthropic
Latent Space · Sep 29, 2026

Presentation: Platform Engineering in the Age of AI
InfoQ · Sep 8, 2026

Sen. Adam Schiff on AI regulation, free speech, and impeaching Trump one more time
The Verge · Oct 5, 2026

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026