aiqbench analysis
Evo-DexBench is a benchmark for robot learning that tests whether a policy trained on related source tasks can generalize to a new task from only a few demonstrations, with source-task relatedness and target-task exposure explicitly controlled. The reported 38.5% best-case success rate suggests current methods still struggle to transfer functional interaction knowledge, and the finding that functionally matched Core data helps more than mismatched data is useful for anyone designing training curricula. Readers should note that the results come from simulated Shadow Hands, so real-world transfer remains untested.
Evo-DexBench: Benchmarking Generalization across Related Tasks for Dexterous Manipulation
arXiv:2610.21180v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: General-purpose dexterous manipulation requires policies to transfer knowledge from related tasks to new tasks with only a few target demonstrations. Existing benchmarks often provide too many target demonstrations. They also leave the differences between source and target tasks uncontrolled. As a result, they cannot clearly distinguish knowledge transfer from task memorization. Our key insight is the Core-Gen principle. Core tasks are related tasks that share a functional interaction and provide source knowledge, while a Gen task is a novel target within the same functional family that has only a few demonstrations. This setup tests whether a policy can reuse functional interaction knowledge. Based on this principle, we propose Evo-DexBench, which controls both source-task relatedness and target-task exposure. It comprises 30 tasks in six functional families and a VR teleoperation pipeline. The resulting dataset covers three everyday scenes per task. It contains 1,248 multimodal demonstrations collected with simulated Shadow Hands equipped with 123 taxels. Experiments show that even the best-performing method achieves an average success rate of only 38.5%, highlighting the challenges existing methods face in transferring functional interaction knowledge. Further analysis shows that, across the two tasks, joint Core+Gen training improves performance by 12% and 38%, respectively, over training on Core followed by fine-tuning on Gen. This indicates that joint training makes better use of Core knowledge and that functionally matched Core data yields greater gains in success rate than mismatched data. We release the Evo-DexBench dataset and benchmark to support the evaluation of dexterous manipulation policies' generalization across related tasks.
Abstract:General-purpose dexterous manipulation requires policies to transfer knowledge from related tasks to new tasks with only a few target demonstrations. Existing benchmarks often provide too many target demonstrations. They also leave the differences between source and target tasks uncontrolled. As a result, they cannot clearly distinguish knowledge transfer from task memorization. Our key insight is the Core-Gen principle. Core tasks are related tasks that share a functional interaction and provide source knowledge, while a Gen task is a novel target within the same functional family that has only a few demonstrations. This setup tests whether a policy can reuse functional interaction knowledge. Based on this principle, we propose Evo-DexBench, which controls both source-task relatedness and target-task exposure. It comprises 30 tasks in six functional families and a VR teleoperation pipeline. The resulting dataset covers three everyday scenes per task. It contains 1,248 multimodal demonstrations collected with simulated Shadow Hands equipped with 123 taxels. Experiments show that even the best-performing method achieves an average success rate of only 38.5%, highlighting the challenges existing methods face in transferring functional interaction knowledge. Further analysis shows that, across the two tasks, joint Core+Gen training improves performance by 12% and 38%, respectively, over training on Core followed by fine-tuning on Gen. This indicates that joint training makes better use of Core knowledge and that functionally matched Core data yields greater gains in success rate than mismatched data. We release the Evo-DexBench dataset and benchmark to support the evaluation of dexterous manipulation policies' generalization across related tasks.
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2610.21180 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2610.21180v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.21180 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 344 words
Related coverage

How to Evaluate General-Purpose Robot Policies for Real-World Deployment
NVIDIA · Jul 12, 2026

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · Oct 12, 2026
State of the Field: AI for Epistemics and Coordination
LessWrong · Oct 2, 2026

Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · Oct 5, 2026