aiqbench analysis
This paper addresses the fragmentation issue in visual attribution for Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) by introducing ERCR, a framework combining evidence recomposition and predictive context residualization. By aggregating multi-view token assignments and subtracting autoregressive interference from preceding text tokens, the method significantly improves the accuracy of grounding generated words to specific image regions on models like Qwen2-VL. The approach offers researchers a more reliable tool for inspecting internal visual reasoning mechanisms without requiring model retraining or architectural changes.
Evidence Recomposition and Predictive Context Residualization for Visual Attribution in Multimodal Large Language Models
arXiv:2509.22415v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved strong vision-language performance, yet their token-level visual evidence remains difficult to inspect. Recent logit-lens attribution methods project each visual-token hidden state into the vocabulary space to explain generated words, but this token-wise readout introduces a mismatch: visual tokens are context-mixed by the model, while the attribution score is decoded independently at each token location. This often produces fragmented attribution maps and can be further affected by autoregressive context signals from preceding text tokens. We propose ERCR, an attribution framework built from Evidence Recomposition (ER) and Predictive Context Residualization (PCR). ER aggregates target evidence across multiple views with different token-to-region assignments, reducing attribution fragmentation caused by a single readout grid. PCR estimates a preceding-token context map with RBO-based rank relevance and subtracts its fitted component from the ER map to suppress context-token interference. Experiments on LLaVA, Qwen2-VL, and InternVL families across COCO Caption, GranDf, and OpenPSG show that ERCR improves visual evidence for target tokens and mitigates preceding-token context interference under the existing evaluation protocol. On Qwen2-VL-2B, ERCR improves TAM F1-IoU from 39.10 to 44.45 on COCO Caption and from 30.83 to 37.20 on GranDf. Overall, ERCR provides a practical refinement for token-level visual evidence inspection.
Abstract:Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved strong vision-language performance, yet their token-level visual evidence remains difficult to inspect. Recent logit-lens attribution methods project each visual-token hidden state into the vocabulary space to explain generated words, but this token-wise readout introduces a mismatch: visual tokens are context-mixed by the model, while the attribution score is decoded independently at each token location. This often produces fragmented attribution maps and can be further affected by autoregressive context signals from preceding text tokens. We propose ERCR, an attribution framework built from Evidence Recomposition (ER) and Predictive Context Residualization (PCR). ER aggregates target evidence across multiple views with different token-to-region assignments, reducing attribution fragmentation caused by a single readout grid. PCR estimates a preceding-token context map with RBO-based rank relevance and subtracts its fitted component from the ER map to suppress context-token interference. Experiments on LLaVA, Qwen2-VL, and InternVL families across COCO Caption, GranDf, and OpenPSG show that ERCR improves visual evidence for target tokens and mitigates preceding-token context interference under the existing evaluation protocol. On Qwen2-VL-2B, ERCR improves TAM F1-IoU from 39.10 to 44.45 on COCO Caption and from 30.83 to 37.20 on GranDf. Overall, ERCR provides a practical refinement for token-level visual evidence inspection.
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2509.22415 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2509.22415v5 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.22415 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 300 words
Related coverage
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · Jul 31, 2026

Hands-free first notice of loss: Using Strands Agents and Amazon Bedrock AgentCore Browser Tool for intelligent claims intake
AWS · Jun 9, 2026
1 Layer Induction Heads and Some Research
LessWrong · Jun 16, 2026
The Evidence Anchoring Boundary: Where Visual Interventions Matter and When They Help in Multimodal LLMs
arXiv · Oct 12, 2026