Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This arXiv paper examines how transformer language models organize word representations, splitting them into item-level, class-level, and word-class interaction components. Its main finding is that the interaction term persists across six pretrained models, grows with depth, and carries class information beyond what the shared class effect explains. It also appears in small artificial-language learners trained on purely additive structure, which suggests the pattern may emerge from learning itself rather than from language-specific design. For AI readers, this is a useful interpretability result, though it is a controlled analysis of two linguistic categories and does not yet show how these representations drive model behavior.
Sources coveringarXiv, LessWrong
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Everyone Was Right: Lexical Representations in Language Models Are Both Abstract and Holistic

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.17538v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Lexical representations can encode both abstract information and information specific to particular contexts. We investigate how these forms of information are organized in language models by decomposing contextual word representations into item, class, and word-class interaction components. Across six pretrained transformers and two linguistic categories, we find that the interaction is consistently present, grows across layers, and contains information associated with both item and class. Unlike the nearly orthogonal item and class effects, the interaction overlaps with both and encodes class information beyond the shared class effect. An interaction also emerges in artificial-language learners even when the input contains only additive structure. Together, these findings show that lexical representations combine abstract information with structure specific to particular word-class combinations.

Abstract:Lexical representations can encode both abstract information and information specific to particular contexts. We investigate how these forms of information are organized in language models by decomposing contextual word representations into item, class, and word-class interaction components. Across six pretrained transformers and two linguistic categories, we find that the interaction is consistently present, grows across layers, and contains information associated with both item and class. Unlike the nearly orthogonal item and class effects, the interaction overlaps with both and encodes class information beyond the shared class effect. An interaction also emerges in artificial-language learners even when the input contains only additive structure. Together, these findings show that lexical representations combine abstract information with structure specific to particular word-class combinations.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2610.17538 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.17538v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.17538 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 214 words

Related coverage