Evaluation of Vision-Language Models Across Diverse Coastal Environments

arXiv:2609.10855v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) enable robotic per- ception by associating visual observations with natural-language concepts. Yet their performance in coastal environments remains largely unexplored. We introduce a densely labeled coastal dataset containing more than 1,000 images collected across seven missions in three regions of Oahu, Hawaii, with 18 semantic classes and over 7,400 annotated instances. We evaluate seven modern VLMs through three complementary experiments mea- suring text-to-mask, mask-to-mask, and mask-to-text alignment. Broad landscape classes are generally recognized more accurately than conventional object and coastal classes, with coastal con- cepts presenting the greatest challenge. However, comparisons of shared conventional classes across coastal and terrestrial datasets reveal no consistent performance difference attributable solely to environmental context. Mask-to-mask matching also remains similar across conventional and coastal classes, while alternative textual labels substantially improve recognition of several coastal concepts. These results suggest that lower performance on coastal classes (at least on the objects/query categories evaluated) is heavily influenced by segmentation and linguistic representation.

Abstract:Vision-language models (VLMs) enable robotic per- ception by associating visual observations with natural-language concepts. Yet their performance in coastal environments remains largely unexplored. We introduce a densely labeled coastal dataset containing more than 1,000 images collected across seven missions in three regions of Oahu, Hawaii, with 18 semantic classes and over 7,400 annotated instances. We evaluate seven modern VLMs through three complementary experiments mea- suring text-to-mask, mask-to-mask, and mask-to-text alignment. Broad landscape classes are generally recognized more accurately than conventional object and coastal classes, with coastal con- cepts presenting the greatest challenge. However, comparisons of shared conventional classes across coastal and terrestrial datasets reveal no consistent performance difference attributable solely to environmental context. Mask-to-mask matching also remains similar across conventional and coastal classes, while alternative textual labels substantially improve recognition of several coastal concepts. These results suggest that lower performance on coastal classes (at least on the objects/query categories evaluated) is heavily influenced by segmentation and linguistic representation.

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2609.10855 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2609.10855v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.10855 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

aiqbench analysis

Evaluation of Vision-Language Models Across Diverse Coastal Environments

Related coverage