aiqbench analysis
This study reveals that Japanese LLMs are significantly vulnerable to character transposition and replacement errors, though they remain relatively robust against IME conversion issues. The findings underscore a critical gap in practical deployment reliability for models handling complex multilingual input systems.
Evaluating the Robustness of Japanese LLMs to IME-Related and Typographical Errors
arXiv:2610.01241v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have achieved strong performance across various natural language processing tasks. However, their robustness to typographical errors remains underexplored, particularly in Japanese, where text input involves multiple writing systems and IME-based conversion. In this study, we evaluate the robustness of Japanese LLMs against realistic Japanese-specific typos. We introduce five typo categories: Character Transposition, Character Replacement, Homophone Conversion, Japanese IME Conversion, and Full-Width Conversion. These perturbations are applied to three Japanese benchmark datasets (JMMLU, JCommonsenseQA, and JamC-QA), and eleven Japanese and multilingual LLMs are evaluated. The results show that Character Transposition and Character Replacement typos consistently reduce accuracy across benchmarks, whereas IME Conversion, Full-Width Conversion, and Homophone Conversion have relatively limited impact. These findings reveal that current Japanese LLMs remain vulnerable to realistic Japanese typing errors, particularly those that substantially distort the original input, highlighting the importance of robustness evaluation in practical input environments.
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) have achieved strong performance across various natural language processing tasks. However, their robustness to typographical errors remains underexplored, particularly in Japanese, where text input involves multiple writing systems and IME-based conversion. In this study, we evaluate the robustness of Japanese LLMs against realistic Japanese-specific typos. We introduce five typo categories: Character Transposition, Character Replacement, Homophone Conversion, Japanese IME Conversion, and Full-Width Conversion. These perturbations are applied to three Japanese benchmark datasets (JMMLU, JCommonsenseQA, and JamC-QA), and eleven Japanese and multilingual LLMs are evaluated. The results show that Character Transposition and Character Replacement typos consistently reduce accuracy across benchmarks, whereas IME Conversion, Full-Width Conversion, and Homophone Conversion have relatively limited impact. These findings reveal that current Japanese LLMs remain vulnerable to realistic Japanese typing errors, particularly those that substantially distort the original input, highlighting the importance of robustness evaluation in practical input environments.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2610.01241 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.01241v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.01241 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 241 words
Related coverage
Productionizing TurboQuant on AMD GPUs for KV-Cache-Bound LLM Inference
AMD · Jun 11, 2026

Small LLMs perform no-CoT two-hop reasoning on synthetic facts with real bridges
LessWrong · Oct 17, 2026

The basic argument for making AI better at moral philosophy
LessWrong · Oct 14, 2026
LANTERN: Language Model Assessment on Noisy and Transformed Tasks for Understanding Error and Robustness Nuances
arXiv · Sep 9, 2026