aiqbench analysis
This research introduces ACES, a framework that shifts agent evaluation from static code scanning to dynamic, paired live trials measuring actual "Skill Lift" in production environments. By normalizing agent trajectories into ATIF and quantifying gains in execution and tool use, the study provides empirical evidence on how reusable capability packages genuinely enhance enterprise task completion rates.
Evaluating Skills, Not Just Agents: Agentic Continuous Evaluation of Skills
arXiv:2608.20614v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Enterprise agent programs are moving from prototypes into production, where reusable skills, tools, and workflow packages must be reviewed with evidence rather than prose. Current gates often scan these artifacts for structure, style, and security, but they do not answer the deployment question: does the capability package help a live agent complete enterprise tasks under the same model, sandbox, and grading policy? We present ACES (Agentic Continuous Evaluation of Skills), a repository-native framework for evaluating skills and product capability packages as executable agent artifacts. ACES runs paired live trials with and without a target skill, normalizes trajectories into the Agent Trajectory Interchange Format (ATIF), grades six default runtime metrics, and reports Skill Lift: the target skill's added value for a fixed task, harness, workspace, and scorer. The same protocol supports product-owned task suites that compare baseline, skill, bundle, team-skill, and plugin targets. On 145 real skills from internal enterprise repositories and public catalogs, scan-only gates surface useful authoring issues but measure complementary facets (structural versus LLM-judge Spearman $\rho = 0.14$). Across 947 scored paired cases from 58 of 64 production skills and four primary harnesses, mean composite Skill Lift is 0.2134 (95\% paired-case CI [0.1967, 0.2301]); mean outcome-only lift, the average of accuracy and goal accuracy, is 0.1799. Composite lift is positive in 72.8\% of paired cases. The largest process-metric gains appear in skill execution, behavior check, and skill efficiency---signals about discovery, routing, workflow following, and tool use that document scans cannot observe. An open-source implementation of the methodology is available in NVIDIA SkillEvaluator.
Abstract:Enterprise agent programs are moving from prototypes into production, where reusable skills, tools, and workflow packages must be reviewed with evidence rather than prose. Current gates often scan these artifacts for structure, style, and security, but they do not answer the deployment question: does the capability package help a live agent complete enterprise tasks under the same model, sandbox, and grading policy? We present ACES (Agentic Continuous Evaluation of Skills), a repository-native framework for evaluating skills and product capability packages as executable agent artifacts. ACES runs paired live trials with and without a target skill, normalizes trajectories into the Agent Trajectory Interchange Format (ATIF), grades six default runtime metrics, and reports Skill Lift: the target skill's added value for a fixed task, harness, workspace, and scorer. The same protocol supports product-owned task suites that compare baseline, skill, bundle, team-skill, and plugin targets. On 145 real skills from internal enterprise repositories and public catalogs, scan-only gates surface useful authoring issues but measure complementary facets (structural versus LLM-judge Spearman $\rho = 0.14$). Across 947 scored paired cases from 58 of 64 production skills and four primary harnesses, mean composite Skill Lift is 0.2134 (95\% paired-case CI [0.1967, 0.2301]); mean outcome-only lift, the average of accuracy and goal accuracy, is 0.1799. Composite lift is positive in 72.8\% of paired cases. The largest process-metric gains appear in skill execution, behavior check, and skill efficiency---signals about discovery, routing, workflow following, and tool use that document scans cannot observe. An open-source implementation of the methodology is available in NVIDIA SkillEvaluator.
15 pages. Extended preprint incorporating versions accepted at Agent Skills '26 (ACM CAIS 2026) and the KDD 2026 Workshop on Enterprise AI Agents: From Prototypes to Production (oral presentation). Open-source implementation: this https URL
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2608.20614 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2608.20614v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.20614 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 306 words
Related coverage

Evaluate skill-equipped agents with Strands Evals and Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
AWS · Sep 22, 2026

Amazon Research Awards recipients announced
Amazon Science · May 27, 2026

How to Train a Cross-Embodiment Robot Navigation Policy with AI Agents
NVIDIA · Aug 26, 2026
What's Continual Learning, and Why Might We Expect To See It In Advanced LLM Agents?
LessWrong · Jun 12, 2026