aiqbench analysis
This research critically assesses the reliability of local explainability methods like LIME and SHAP on complex tabular data, revealing that explanation quality often depends more on dataset characteristics than model accuracy. The findings highlight a significant gap between human-perceived plausibility and actual internal reasoning in AI models, urging practitioners to consider feature distribution complexities when interpreting ML outputs.
Evaluating Local Explainability Metrics for Machine Learning Models on Tabular Data
arXiv:2605.27618v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Despite the wide use of explainability techniques to attempt to understand the behavior of Artificial Intelligence (AI), the generated explanations may not always be reliable. An explanation can appear plausible to humans but fail to capture the internal reasoning of a model, particularly when dealing with complex tabular data. This paper studies the trustworthiness of local explainability techniques when applied to complex tabular classification tasks, considering evaluated metrics for three main properties: faithfulness to the model's predictions, robustness to input data variations, and complexity of the explanation itself. A benchmark was performed for Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME), Kernel SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), and Feature Ablation techniques, across 32 datasets and different types of machine learning models. Model performance ranges were analyzed to identify two groups: consensus-correct, which are samples that all models predicted correctly, and consensus-wrong, samples that all models predicted incorrectly. The obtained results demonstrate that that the explanations are not always correlated with a model's predictive performance. Instead, dataset complexity and feature distributions seem to be the main factors affecting explanation quality and reliability.
Abstract:Despite the wide use of explainability techniques to attempt to understand the behavior of Artificial Intelligence (AI), the generated explanations may not always be reliable. An explanation can appear plausible to humans but fail to capture the internal reasoning of a model, particularly when dealing with complex tabular data. This paper studies the trustworthiness of local explainability techniques when applied to complex tabular classification tasks, considering evaluated metrics for three main properties: faithfulness to the model's predictions, robustness to input data variations, and complexity of the explanation itself. A benchmark was performed for Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME), Kernel SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), and Feature Ablation techniques, across 32 datasets and different types of machine learning models. Model performance ranges were analyzed to identify two groups: consensus-correct, which are samples that all models predicted correctly, and consensus-wrong, samples that all models predicted incorrectly. The obtained results demonstrate that that the explanations are not always correlated with a model's predictive performance. Instead, dataset complexity and feature distributions seem to be the main factors affecting explanation quality and reliability.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2605.27618 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2605.27618v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.27618 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 269 words
Related coverage

Evaluating multi-agent systems for explainability and helpfulness with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
AWS · Oct 5, 2026
Beyond Trained Models: Compiling GNNs for a Sound Explainer Benchmark
arXiv · Oct 6, 2026
Detect, Explain, Interpret: An End-to-End Benchmark for Time Series Anomaly Detection, Explainability and Interpretability
arXiv · Oct 2, 2026
A Multi-Dimensional Evaluation of Explainability in Media Bias Detection
arXiv · Jul 23, 2026