aiqbench analysis
This research demonstrates that sufficiently large LLMs can serve as interpretable controllers for physical dynamical systems, provided they are grounded in domain-specific physics models. The study highlights a critical threshold where model complexity enables coherent reasoning and anticipatory decision-making essential for stable control of environments like thermal regulation. These findings suggest viable pathways for hybrid architectures combining language-driven flexibility with rigorous model-based constraints to ensure safety and efficiency in real-world applications.
Evaluating LLMs as Interpretable Controllers for Dynamical Systems
arXiv:2607.22609v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for decision-making and reasoning tasks, yet their potential as controllers for physical systems remains largely unexplored. This work investigates whether LLMs can function as interpretable controllers for a dynamic thermal environment, examining their ability to follow setpoints, interpret natural-language commands, reason about actuator effects, and incorporate prior model-based knowledge. Five LLMs of varying scales are evaluated under multiple scenarios, including settings with penalties on heater or fan usage and cases where the models have access to a physics-based prediction tool. The results show that control performance depends on model complexity: while low- and mid-scale models frequently misinterpret actuator dynamics or generate inconsistent reasoning, high-complexity models such as Qwen-3~14B and GPT-4o achieve accurate temperature tracking, stable actuator usage, and coherent explanations aligned with physical principles. Incorporating a physics-based model significantly improves control smoothness and energy efficiency by enabling anticipatory decision-making. A detailed reasoning taxonomy further reveals a clear progression from causal misinterpretation in smaller models to cohesive and temporally aware reasoning in larger ones. The findings demonstrate that LLMs can act as interpretable controllers when sufficiently capable and appropriately grounded in domain knowledge, highlighting promising opportunities for hybrid model-based and language-driven control strategies that can provide plausible explanations.
Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for decision-making and reasoning tasks, yet their potential as controllers for physical systems remains largely unexplored. This work investigates whether LLMs can function as interpretable controllers for a dynamic thermal environment, examining their ability to follow setpoints, interpret natural-language commands, reason about actuator effects, and incorporate prior model-based knowledge. Five LLMs of varying scales are evaluated under multiple scenarios, including settings with penalties on heater or fan usage and cases where the models have access to a physics-based prediction tool. The results show that control performance depends on model complexity: while low- and mid-scale models frequently misinterpret actuator dynamics or generate inconsistent reasoning, high-complexity models such as Qwen-3~14B and GPT-4o achieve accurate temperature tracking, stable actuator usage, and coherent explanations aligned with physical principles. Incorporating a physics-based model significantly improves control smoothness and energy efficiency by enabling anticipatory decision-making. A detailed reasoning taxonomy further reveals a clear progression from causal misinterpretation in smaller models to cohesive and temporally aware reasoning in larger ones. The findings demonstrate that LLMs can act as interpretable controllers when sufficiently capable and appropriately grounded in domain knowledge, highlighting promising opportunities for hybrid model-based and language-driven control strategies that can provide plausible explanations.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2607.22609 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2607.22609v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.22609 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 296 words
Related coverage

2026 BAIR Graduate Showcase
BAIR Blog · Jul 1, 2026
Angles of attack for continual learning safety
LessWrong · Jun 16, 2026
How might continual learning affect safety and alignment?
LessWrong · Jun 13, 2026

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026