Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This study empirically evaluates the limits of applying deep learning models like LSTMs and Transformers to predict hardware errors on large-scale HPC systems using seven years of production data from Theta supercomputer. The findings indicate that forecasting accuracy is highly dependent on error temporal structure, with stable patterns being predictable while sparse bursts remain elusive for current architectures. Consequently, this research offers critical guidance on the viability of predictive maintenance strategies rather than providing a ready-to-deploy solution.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Evaluating Forecasting Techniques for Hardware Errors on a Large-scale HPC System

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.01648v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hardware error logs in high-performance computing (HPC) systems provide early signals of abnormal behavior, yet there remain challenges in effectively forecasting these errors using modern predictive methods. This work investigates the boundaries of applying time series forecasting to HPC hardware error dynamics. We use seven years of production logs from the Theta supercomputer to evaluate the predictive efficacy of classical statistical and deep learning models. Our results show that forecasting effectiveness depends strongly on the temporal structure of the error series: regularly occurring and structurally stable errors can be modeled accurately, particularly by LSTM and Transformer architectures with temporal features, while sparse and burst-dominated errors remain difficult to predict. Rather than proposing a deployment-ready failure prediction framework, this study provides empirical guidance on when forecasting is effective and highlights potential directions for improving forecasting accuracy in HPC hardware error analysis.

Abstract:Hardware error logs in high-performance computing (HPC) systems provide early signals of abnormal behavior, yet there remain challenges in effectively forecasting these errors using modern predictive methods. This work investigates the boundaries of applying time series forecasting to HPC hardware error dynamics. We use seven years of production logs from the Theta supercomputer to evaluate the predictive efficacy of classical statistical and deep learning models. Our results show that forecasting effectiveness depends strongly on the temporal structure of the error series: regularly occurring and structurally stable errors can be modeled accurately, particularly by LSTM and Transformer architectures with temporal features, while sparse and burst-dominated errors remain difficult to predict. Rather than proposing a deployment-ready failure prediction framework, this study provides empirical guidance on when forecasting is effective and highlights potential directions for improving forecasting accuracy in HPC hardware error analysis.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2608.01648 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2608.01648v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.01648 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 234 words

Related coverage