aiqbench analysis
EulerESG demonstrates how Large Language Models can effectively parse heterogeneous ESG PDFs by explicitly modeling reporting standards rather than treating documents as generic text. The system achieves high fidelity in populating metric tables and offers a practical chatbot interface for benchmarking corporate disclosures across multiple industries. This work highlights the growing utility of AI in automating complex, domain-specific regulatory analysis where traditional rule-based extraction fails.
EulerESG: Automating ESG Disclosure Analysis with LLMs
arXiv:2511.21712v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reports have become central to how companies communicate climate risk, social impact, and governance practices, yet they are still published primarily as long, heterogeneous PDF documents. This makes it difficult to systematically answer seemingly simple questions. Existing tools either rely on brittle rule-based extraction or treat ESG reports as generic text, without explicitly modelling the underlying reporting standards. We present \textbf{EulerESG}, an LLM-powered system for automating ESG disclosure analysis with explicit awareness of ESG frameworks. EulerESG combines (i) dual-channel retrieval and LLM-driven disclosure analysis over ESG reports, and (ii) an interactive dashboard and chatbot for exploration, benchmarking, and explanation. Using four globally recognised companies and twelve SASB sub-industries, we show that EulerESG can automatically populate standard-aligned metric tables with high fidelity (up to 0.95 average accuracy) while remaining practical in end-to-end runtime, and we compare several recent LLM models in this setting. The full implementation, together with a demonstration video, is publicly available at https://github.com/UNSW-database/EulerESG.
Abstract:Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reports have become central to how companies communicate climate risk, social impact, and governance practices, yet they are still published primarily as long, heterogeneous PDF documents. This makes it difficult to systematically answer seemingly simple questions. Existing tools either rely on brittle rule-based extraction or treat ESG reports as generic text, without explicitly modelling the underlying reporting standards. We present \textbf{EulerESG}, an LLM-powered system for automating ESG disclosure analysis with explicit awareness of ESG frameworks. EulerESG combines (i) dual-channel retrieval and LLM-driven disclosure analysis over ESG reports, and (ii) an interactive dashboard and chatbot for exploration, benchmarking, and explanation. Using four globally recognised companies and twelve SASB sub-industries, we show that EulerESG can automatically populate standard-aligned metric tables with high fidelity (up to 0.95 average accuracy) while remaining practical in end-to-end runtime, and we compare several recent LLM models in this setting. The full implementation, together with a demonstration video, is publicly available at this https URL.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY)
arXiv:2511.21712 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2511.21712v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.21712 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 262 words
Related coverage

Beyond LLMs: Why Scalable Enterprise AI Adoption Depends on Agent Logic
Hugging Face · Jun 1, 2026
We cannot simulate AI security research
LessWrong · Jul 22, 2026
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · Oct 17, 2026
State of the Field: AI for Epistemics and Coordination
LessWrong · Oct 2, 2026