Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Safety

aiqbench analysis

This research challenges the prevailing power-law scaling of Best-of-N jailbreaking attacks by introducing a physical barrier model grounded in statistical mechanics. By treating prompt augmentations as thermally activated barriers, the study provides a unified framework that accurately predicts attack success rates across diverse models and generation temperatures. The findings offer interpretable safety mechanisms to better understand and mitigate adversarial vulnerabilities in aligned AI systems.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Escaping Alignment: A Physical Trap Model of Best-of-N Jailbreaking

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.32116v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Best-of-$N$ jailbreaking (BoN) bypasses safeguards of aligned models by drawing $N$ independent augmentations of an unsafe prompt and sampling $M$ completions of each. Previous works have shown that the attack success rate (ASR) seems to follow a power-law in $N$, which we challenge. The exponent drifts with $N$, with an exponential crossover which is a finite-size artifact of the adversarial dataset. Little work has been done to explore the entire two-budget ($N, M$) attack surface as well as its dependence on the generation temperature $T$. We introduce a simple barrier model where each prompt has a baseline safety level and each augmentation a random thermally activated barrier. Then four numbers, each backed by an interpretable safety mechanism, determine the entire ($N, M$) attack surface. They extrapolate predictions from $N \leq 100$ to $N = 10^4$, collapse five distinct models on the same scaling function and predict ASR at different temperatures from the one they were fitted at.

Abstract:Best-of-$N$ jailbreaking (BoN) bypasses safeguards of aligned models by drawing $N$ independent augmentations of an unsafe prompt and sampling $M$ completions of each. Previous works have shown that the attack success rate (ASR) seems to follow a power-law in $N$, which we challenge. The exponent drifts with $N$, with an exponential crossover which is a finite-size artifact of the adversarial dataset. Little work has been done to explore the entire two-budget ($N, M$) attack surface as well as its dependence on the generation temperature $T$. We introduce a simple barrier model where each prompt has a baseline safety level and each augmentation a random thermally activated barrier. Then four numbers, each backed by an interpretable safety mechanism, determine the entire ($N, M$) attack surface. They extrapolate predictions from $N \leq 100$ to $N = 10^4$, collapse five distinct models on the same scaling function and predict ASR at different temperatures from the one they were fitted at.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Statistical Mechanics (cond-mat.stat-mech)

arXiv:2609.32116 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2609.32116v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.32116 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 254 words

Related coverage