Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper offers a rigorous theoretical breakdown of error sources in neural-network-based engression, decomposing excess risk into approximation, stochastic, and Monte Carlo components to establish convergence rates for generative modeling under energy scores. By formalizing the smoothness assumptions required for these deep learning approaches, it provides essential insights for researchers developing robust probabilistic machine learning models rather than focusing on immediate product applications or consumer impacts.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Error Analysis of Neural-Network-Based Engression

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2607.27723v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Engression (Shen and Meinshausen, 2024) learns a conditional distribution by fitting a generative model $Y = f(X,\varepsilon)$ under the energy score, a strictly proper scoring rule. We provide a theoretical error analysis of engression implemented with deep neural networks. We decompose the excess risk into three components: the approximation error, the stochastic error, and the Monte Carlo error. Based on this decomposition, we establish convergence rates under the assumption that the target conditional generator admits a compositional smoothness structure.

Abstract:Engression (Shen and Meinshausen, 2024) learns a conditional distribution by fitting a generative model $Y = f(X,\varepsilon)$ under the energy score, a strictly proper scoring rule. We provide a theoretical error analysis of engression implemented with deep neural networks. We decompose the excess risk into three components: the approximation error, the stochastic error, and the Monte Carlo error. Based on this decomposition, we establish convergence rates under the assumption that the target conditional generator admits a compositional smoothness structure.

Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Methodology (stat.ME)

arXiv:2607.27723 [stat.ML]

(or arXiv:2607.27723v1 [stat.ML] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.27723 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 178 words

Related coverage