Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI & Society

aiqbench analysis

The Epstein Files Engine demonstrates the practical utility of agentic AI in investigative journalism by acting as a trusted interface to massive, unstructured datasets rather than an autonomous writer. By translating reporter intent into SQL queries and employing novel duplicate-matching techniques, this system successfully surfaced new information across three distinct corpora for over 100 journalists. This case study highlights how AI agents can augment human inquiry in high-stakes environments where verification and institutional knowledge are paramount.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Epstein Files Engine: Agentic Search for Investigative Journalism

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.30611v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: On Jan. 30, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice released a mixed-media collection concerning Jeffrey Epstein, including about three million pages of PDFs. We describe the Epstein Files Engine, an A.I. agent The New York Times deployed to investigate the files. The Engine translated reporter questions into Google BigQuery SQL queries across three corpora: Epstein-related releases, the Times's archive and external, Epstein-related news headlines. It used an LLM to plan queries and returned citation-rich answers a reporter could verify and trust. More than 100 journalists used the Engine, and it contributed to at least 20 published stories. We report how reporters queried it and describe Diff, our text-and-visual duplicate matching method that amplified novelty signals and allowed the Engine to surface genuinely new information. We argue that newsroom agents serve newsrooms best not as autonomous writers, but as interfaces to source material and institutional knowledge.

Abstract:On Jan. 30, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice released a mixed-media collection concerning Jeffrey Epstein, including about three million pages of PDFs. We describe the Epstein Files Engine, an A.I. agent The New York Times deployed to investigate the files. The Engine translated reporter questions into Google BigQuery SQL queries across three corpora: Epstein-related releases, the Times's archive and external, Epstein-related news headlines. It used an LLM to plan queries and returned citation-rich answers a reporter could verify and trust. More than 100 journalists used the Engine, and it contributed to at least 20 published stories. We report how reporters queried it and describe Diff, our text-and-visual duplicate matching method that amplified novelty signals and allowed the Engine to surface genuinely new information. We argue that newsroom agents serve newsrooms best not as autonomous writers, but as interfaces to source material and institutional knowledge.

6 pages, 2 figures, 2 tables. Presented at the Computation + Journalism Symposium (C+J 2026)

Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)

arXiv:2609.30611 [cs.HC]

(or arXiv:2609.30611v1 [cs.HC] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.30611 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 265 words

Related coverage