aiqbench analysis
This research advances causal discovery in machine learning by establishing identifiability conditions for mixed datasets containing ordinal and count variables, extending beyond traditional continuous additive noise models. The authors introduce a new computational framework combining exhaustive search with masked continuous optimization to recover edge orientations previously deemed unidentifiable. These theoretical and algorithmic contributions are significant for improving the robustness of causal inference in real-world observational data where variable types vary.
Epidemiological Causal Graph Identification: Challenges, Identifiability and Algorithms
arXiv:2609.20676v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Causal discovery from observational data is fundamental to statistics and machine learning, yet determining causal direction without interventions necessitates structural assumptions. Existing identifiability research primarily focuses on continuous variables under additive noise models, often neglecting mixed datasets containing ordinal scales, counts, and continuous measurements. This paper investigates causal discovery in Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) where nodes follow either an ordinal distribution (via an ordered logit model) or a regular one-parameter exponential family distribution. We prove that the edge direction between an ordinal and an exponential family node is distributionally identifiable for generic parameter values. Our findings generalize previous Ordinal-Poisson results to the broader exponential family. Computationally, we introduce a score-based exhaustive search and a masked continuous optimization framework using DAGMA for larger graphs. Numerical results validate the theory, recovering edge orientations within a Markov equivalence class that are unidentifiable under classical structural equation models.
Abstract:Causal discovery from observational data is fundamental to statistics and machine learning, yet determining causal direction without interventions necessitates structural assumptions. Existing identifiability research primarily focuses on continuous variables under additive noise models, often neglecting mixed datasets containing ordinal scales, counts, and continuous measurements. This paper investigates causal discovery in Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) where nodes follow either an ordinal distribution (via an ordered logit model) or a regular one-parameter exponential family distribution. We prove that the edge direction between an ordinal and an exponential family node is distributionally identifiable for generic parameter values. Our findings generalize previous Ordinal-Poisson results to the broader exponential family. Computationally, we introduce a score-based exhaustive search and a masked continuous optimization framework using DAGMA for larger graphs. Numerical results validate the theory, recovering edge orientations within a Markov equivalence class that are unidentifiable under classical structural equation models.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Methodology (stat.ME); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2609.20676 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.20676v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.20676 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 243 words
Related coverage
Clustering and Pruning in Causal Data Fusion
arXiv · Sep 9, 2026

From weeks to minutes: How Formula 1® uses agentic AI on AWS to accelerate data operations
AWS · Aug 3, 2026

Quantum agents can reason consistently, new framework shows
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 10, 2026
Reasoning Models Are Accurate but Unsound on Identification
arXiv · Oct 6, 2026