aiqbench analysis
This research investigates a critical nuance in Quantum Volume benchmarking for NISQ devices, revealing how depolarizing noise can artificially inflate heavy-output probabilities even when global entanglement has been destroyed. The study highlights the potential discrepancy between passing standard volume thresholds and maintaining genuine computational coherence due to finite system size effects.
Entanglement Negativity in Noisy Quantum Volume Sampling
arXiv:2608.13654v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The Quantum Volume protocol uses scrambling random circuits to benchmark NISQ computers. Quantum Volume is generally well-regarded as a benchmark for small, noisy, quantum computers because it requires the quantum computer to implement many non-local entangling gates within a square-shaped circuit, which incentivizes high qubit count, long qubit coherence times, and low error rates on all hardware gates. Quantum Volume circuits inherently produce high-entanglement states that are fragile to errors and decoherence. The Quantum Volume benchmark measures an observable called heavy-output-probability (HOP), where an HOP of $0.5$ corresponds to complete loss of coherence, and in the limit of system size an HOP $\approx 0.84$ for a fully coherent quantum processor. Here, we numerically study the tradeoff between depolarizing noise, entanglement as quantified by the bipartite negativity measure, and HOP in quantum volume circuits. Our results contextualize prior small scale quantum volume demonstrations on quantum computers and highlight that under depolarizing noise, due to finite system size effects heavy output probabilities can be greater than $0.5$ while the bipartite negativity entanglement has been destroyed. This implies, although improbable, that a NISQ computer could pass the Quantum Volume benchmark test threshold of $2/3$ while the underlying quantum computation has no global entanglement -- albeit only for small $n$.
Abstract:The Quantum Volume protocol uses scrambling random circuits to benchmark NISQ computers. Quantum Volume is generally well-regarded as a benchmark for small, noisy, quantum computers because it requires the quantum computer to implement many non-local entangling gates within a square-shaped circuit, which incentivizes high qubit count, long qubit coherence times, and low error rates on all hardware gates. Quantum Volume circuits inherently produce high-entanglement states that are fragile to errors and decoherence. The Quantum Volume benchmark measures an observable called heavy-output-probability (HOP), where an HOP of $0.5$ corresponds to complete loss of coherence, and in the limit of system size an HOP $\approx 0.84$ for a fully coherent quantum processor. Here, we numerically study the tradeoff between depolarizing noise, entanglement as quantified by the bipartite negativity measure, and HOP in quantum volume circuits. Our results contextualize prior small scale quantum volume demonstrations on quantum computers and highlight that under depolarizing noise, due to finite system size effects heavy output probabilities can be greater than $0.5$ while the bipartite negativity entanglement has been destroyed. This implies, although improbable, that a NISQ computer could pass the Quantum Volume benchmark test threshold of $2/3$ while the underlying quantum computation has no global entanglement -- albeit only for small $n$.
arXiv:2608.13654 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2608.13654v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.13654 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 297 words
Related coverage

Quantifying mixed-state entanglement via partial transpose and realignment moments
Quantum Journal · Aug 19, 2026

New study probes entanglement in noisy quantum processors
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 6, 2026

A brief history of quantum vs classical computational advantage
Quantum Journal · Sep 1, 2026
Measurement-induced entanglement in noisy 2D random circuits
arXiv · Aug 7, 2026