aiqbench analysis
This research proposes a mechanistic intervention framework to transfer latent reasoning capabilities from high-resource languages to low-resource ones by manipulating sparse autoencoder features in the model's residual stream. By treating cross-lingual performance gaps as failures of mechanism elicitation rather than inherent capability limits, the study offers a causally testable route to improve mathematical reasoning without relying on translation or fine-tuning. This approach provides significant insight into how large language models internally process and activate specific computational pathways across different linguistic contexts.
Enhancing Low-Resource Language Reasoning via High-Resource Language Feature Transfer
arXiv:2608.30462v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models exhibit substantial performance variation across languages, even when solving semantically equivalent tasks. Existing analyses often treat this phenomenon as an observational disparity caused by differences in pretraining data, tokenization, or benchmark coverage. We study a complementary hypothesis: high-resource languages (HRLs) may more reliably elicit latent computations useful for task-specific (i.e. mathematical) reasoning, while lower-resource languages (LRLs) may under-activate those computations despite expressing the same task. To test this hypothesis, we introduce a mechanistic intervention framework for identifying and transferring task-relevant sparse latent features across languages. Using sparse autoencoders over residual-stream activations, we isolate features enriched in successful HRL task-specific reasoning while filtering out source-language and generic-generation features. We then construct steering directions from these features and inject them during LRL inference. The resulting interventions test whether the selected features are functionally involved in the observed reasoning gap: suppressing them should impair source-language reasoning, while activating them should partially recover target-language reasoning beyond random and non-task controls. Our framework reframes some cross-lingual reasoning gaps as failures of mechanism elicitation rather than capability absence, and offers a causally testable route to feature-mediated transfer without translation, fine-tuning, or changing the user-facing language.
Abstract:Large language models exhibit substantial performance variation across languages, even when solving semantically equivalent tasks. Existing analyses often treat this phenomenon as an observational disparity caused by differences in pretraining data, tokenization, or benchmark coverage. We study a complementary hypothesis: high-resource languages (HRLs) may more reliably elicit latent computations useful for task-specific (i.e. mathematical) reasoning, while lower-resource languages (LRLs) may under-activate those computations despite expressing the same task. To test this hypothesis, we introduce a mechanistic intervention framework for identifying and transferring task-relevant sparse latent features across languages. Using sparse autoencoders over residual-stream activations, we isolate features enriched in successful HRL task-specific reasoning while filtering out source-language and generic-generation features. We then construct steering directions from these features and inject them during LRL inference. The resulting interventions test whether the selected features are functionally involved in the observed reasoning gap: suppressing them should impair source-language reasoning, while activating them should partially recover target-language reasoning beyond random and non-task controls. Our framework reframes some cross-lingual reasoning gaps as failures of mechanism elicitation rather than capability absence, and offers a causally testable route to feature-mediated transfer without translation, fine-tuning, or changing the user-facing language.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2608.30462 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2608.30462v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.30462 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 290 words
Related coverage

Vertical Advantage: Transforming Industries with Lakebase and Agentic AI
Databricks · Aug 27, 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026

NVIDIA GTC Taipei at COMPUTEX: Live Updates on What’s Next in AI
NVIDIA · May 21, 2026